Usage / Role
4%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
DL • 6'4" • Houston, TX, USA
Christian Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.7 disruption score.
Usage / Role
4%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a defensive lineman
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
22
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Christian Harper, DL. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Christian Harper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.7 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 3 | 7 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 40.2 |
Related Context
Christian Harper played DL for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Christian Harper recorded 7 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 9.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
9.7
Usage
1.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 4 by 16.7. Southern Miss: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
16.7 vs Army
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 9.7 | 1.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Army
Week 3 · L 14-66
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Havoc Plays
10.6 takeover
0 disruption/tackle impact with 10.6 takeover score.
#2
vs Southern Miss
Week 4 · L 7-34 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
6.4 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.4 takeover score.
#3
@ Louisiana Tech
Week 5 · L 7-28 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
3.6 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 9.7 efficiency · 1.3 usage
40.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.