Usage / Role
20%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
WR • 6'1" • El Paso, TX, USA
Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
20%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
50
Solid production for a receiver
Reliability
47
Useful contributor with volatile peaks
Star Power
61
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Freytag built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from El Paso, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Cole Freytag's career was his receiving role: 51 catches,...
Read the storyCole Freytag, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 52.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 14 | 257 | 3 | 59.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 36 | 520 | 5 | 77 |
Related Context
Cole Freytag played WR for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cole Freytag recorded -3 rushing yards, 788 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 520 primary output with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43.3
Efficiency
86.6
Usage
18.5
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 95. Texas: 12. Army: 22. Southern Miss: 33. Louisiana Tech: 45. Florida International: 68. UTSA: 19. Old Dominion: 84. Houston Christian: 18. Florida Atlantic: 53. Rice: 26. North Texas: 45
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 4 by 100. Texas: 2 by 40. Army: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 100. Florida International: 5 by 90.7. UTSA: 1 by 100. Old Dominion: 7 by 80. Houston Christian: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 70.7. Rice: 3 by 57.8. North Texas: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs North Texas | W 52-24 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 24-44 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 31-35 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Houston Christian | W 42-10 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UTSA | W 52-49 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Florida International | L 21-35 | — | 5 | 68 | 12 | 13.60 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 7-28 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-34 | — | 1 | 33 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Army | L 14-66 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Texas | L 7-41 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs New Mexico State | W 38-22 | — | 4 | 95 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 1 | 46 |
Player Story
Cole Freytag built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from El Paso, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Cole Freytag's career was his receiving role: 51 catches, 788 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 20 career games in the available record. That gives Cole Freytag's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 73.3 | 10 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -11 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 257 | 82.4 | 13.6 | 257 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 520 | 86.6 | 18.5 | 263 |
#1 Featured game
vs New Mexico State
Week 1 · W 38-22
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95
Receiving Yards
96.3 takeover
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Old Dominion
Week 9 · L 21-31 · Conference game
84
Receiving Yards
89.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
vs Florida International
Week 6 · L 21-35 · Conference game
68
Receiving Yards
86.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ Florida International
Week 6 · L 12-52 · Conference game
81
Receiving Yards
85.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs North Texas
Week 13 · W 52-24 · Conference game
45
Receiving Yards
76.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
520 primary output · 86.6 efficiency · 18.5 usage
77
#2
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
59.9
257 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
52.2
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 10 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.