Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
WR • 6'1" • El Paso, TX, USA
Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
42
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
40
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
50
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Cole Freytag built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from El Paso, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Cole Freytag's career was his receiving role: 51 catches,...
Read the storyCole Freytag, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Cole Freytag reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 52.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 14 | 257 | 3 | 59.9 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 36 | 520 | 5 | 77 |
Related Context
Cole Freytag played WR for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cole Freytag recorded -3 rushing yards, 788 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 520 primary output with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
36.7
Efficiency
82.4
Usage
13.6
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 58. Incarnate Word: 0. Florida International: 81. Florida Atlantic: 28. Southern Miss: 41. Old Dominion: 13. Louisiana Tech: 36
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 91.1. Old Dominion: 2 by 43.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 15-17 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Old Dominion | L 21-31 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Southern Miss | L 13-34 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Florida International | L 12-52 | — | 2 | 81 | 40.5 | 40.50 | 1 | 58 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Incarnate Word | W 27-17 | — | — | — | -7 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/20 | @ New Mexico State | W 50-47 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 48 |
Player Story
Cole Freytag built his college career from 2012 through 2016 as a wide receiver from El Paso, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Cole Freytag's career was his receiving role: 51 catches, 788 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 20 career games in the available record. That gives Cole Freytag's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 11 | 73.3 | 10 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -11 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 257 | 82.4 | 13.6 | 257 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 520 | 86.6 | 18.5 | 263 |
#1 Featured game
vs New Mexico State
Week 1 · W 38-22
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
95
Receiving Yards
96.3 takeover
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Old Dominion
Week 9 · L 21-31 · Conference game
84
Receiving Yards
89.5 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
vs Florida International
Week 6 · L 21-35 · Conference game
68
Receiving Yards
86.8 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#4
@ Florida International
Week 6 · L 12-52 · Conference game
81
Receiving Yards
85.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs North Texas
Week 13 · W 52-24 · Conference game
45
Receiving Yards
76.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
520 primary output · 86.6 efficiency · 18.5 usage
77
#2
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
59.9
257 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 13.6 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
52.2
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 10 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.