Usage / Role
6%
Rotational defensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2012-2016UTEP
Cooper Foster
LB • 6'1" • Cedar Park, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cooper Foster shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.2 disruption score.
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a linebacker
lowelite
Reliability
11
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
27
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
1213141516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
2★
- Committed To
- UTEP
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Cooper Foster, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Cooper Foster shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.2 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 11
Quick Answers
Cooper Foster quick answers
- Latest team and position
- UTEP · LB
- Career Tackles
- 11
- Tracked sample
- 5 unique seasons · 5 entries · 5 games
- Best season
- 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
- Top game
- Army
- Recruit profile
- 2-star · Vista Ridge · UTEP
- High school pipeline
- Vista Ridge · 7 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 44 · Class 2016
- 2016 Tackles rank
- 11 tackles · LB 638th (top 62%) · Conference USA 270th (top 47%) · National 2,572nd (top 46%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 5 | 11 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 39.8 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Cooper Foster
Cooper Foster played LB for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, Cooper Foster recorded 11 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with UTEP.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
5
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
9.2
Usage
1.2
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 0. Army: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Florida International: 0. Houston Christian: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 1 by 4.2. Army: 7 by 29.2. Southern Miss: 1 by 4.2. Florida International: 1 by 4.2. Houston Christian: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 1 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
29.2 vs Army
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20122013201420152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 9.2 | 1.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Army
Week 3 · L 14-66
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Havoc Plays
18.6 takeover
0 disruption/tackle impact with 18.6 takeover score.
#2
vs Houston Christian
Week 10 · W 42-10
0
Havoc Plays
3.9 takeover
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.9 takeover score.
#3
vs Southern Miss
Week 4 · L 7-34 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
3.3 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
#4
@ Texas
Week 2 · L 7-41
0
Havoc Plays
3.3 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.
#5
vs Florida International
Week 6 · L 21-35 · Conference game
0
Havoc Plays
3.1 takeover
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 9.2 efficiency · 1.2 usage
39.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cooper Foster
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.