Usage Score
32.7
Player Dossier
2012-2012UTEP
Michael Edwards
WR • 5'11" • Glendora, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Michael Edwards reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.4
Consistency
66.1
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP
12
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Edwards, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTEP. Michael Edwards reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTEP paired 820 primary output with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
74.5
Efficiency
82.4
Usage
32.7
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Ole Miss: 88. New Mexico State: 86. Wisconsin: 151. East Carolina: 130. SMU: 9. Tulane: 82. Houston: 55. UCF: 9. Southern Miss: 89. Rice: 121
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 9 by 65.2. New Mexico State: 5 by 100. Wisconsin: 7 by 100. East Carolina: 6 by 100. SMU: 1 by 60. Tulane: 7 by 78.1. Houston: 6 by 61.1. UCF: 1 by 60. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Rice: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins85.7 · n=3 · +15.3 vs Losses
Losses70.4 · n=8 · -15.3 vs Wins
First Half77.3 · n=6 · +6.1 vs Second Half
Second Half71.2 · n=5 · -6.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs Rice100 receiving yards | L 24-33 | — | 5 | 121 | 24.2 | 24.20 | 1 | 49 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Southern Miss | W 34-33 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs UCF | L 24-31 | — | 1 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Houston2+ TD | L 35-45 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.1 | 9.20 | 2 | 16 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Tulane2+ TD | W 24-20 | — | 7 | 82 | 10.3 | 11.70 | 2 | 28 |
| Sun 10/7 | vs SMU | L 0-17 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards | L 18-28 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wisconsin100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 26-37 | — | 7 | 151 | 21.6 | 21.60 | 2 | 62 |
| Sun 9/16 | vs New Mexico State | W 41-28 | — | 5 | 86 | 18.8 | 17.20 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Ole MissHigh volume | L 10-28 | — | 9 | 88 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 9/2 | vs Oklahoma | L 7-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 820 | 82.4 | 32.7 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130
Primary metric
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
151
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
121
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
820 primary output · 82.4 efficiency · 32.7 usage
68.8
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
820
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.