Usage Score
21
Player Dossier
2012-2013Utah State
WR • 5'7" • Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Bruce Natson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21
Efficiency
42.9
Consistency
57.1
Season Value
50.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bruce Natson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Utah State. Bruce Natson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Bruce Natson played WR for Utah State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Bruce Natson recorded 113 rushing yards, 527 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Utah State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Utah State paired 395 primary output with 42.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 42.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
28.2
Efficiency
42.9
Usage
21
Consistency
57.1
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 11. Utah: 83. Air Force: 41. Unknown: 35. USC: 21. San José State: 34. BYU: 0. Boise State: 19. New Mexico: 17. Hawai'i: 34. UNLV: 40. Colorado State: -4. Wyoming: 14. Fresno State: 50
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 3 by 24.4. Utah: 9 by 61.5. Air Force: 5 by 54.7. Unknown: 5 by 46.7. USC: 4 by 35. San José State: 5 by 45.3. Boise State: 4 by 31.7. New Mexico: 3 by 37.8. Hawai'i: 7 by 32.4. UNLV: 3 by 88.9. Colorado State: 1 by 0. Wyoming: 6 by 15.6. Fresno State: 4 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
88.9 vs UNLV
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/27 | @ Northern Illinois | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 11 | 1.8 | 3.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Fresno State | L 17-24 | — | 4 | 50 | 10.2 | 12.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wyoming | W 35-7 | — | 6 | 14 | 0.2 | 2.30 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Colorado State | W 13-0 | — | 1 | -4 | -0.8 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ UNLV | W 28-24 | — | 3 | 40 | 9.2 | 13.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Hawai'i | W 47-10 | — | 7 | 34 | 3.8 | 4.90 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ New Mexico | W 45-10 | — | 3 | 17 | 7.8 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Boise State | L 23-34 | — | 4 | 19 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs BYU | L 14-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ San José State | W 40-12 | — | 5 | 34 | 8 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ USC | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Air Force | W 52-20 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 26-30 | — | 9 | 83 | 7.4 | 9.20 | 0 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Utah State | 132 | 51.5 | 8.9 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah State | 132 | 51.5 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Utah State | 395 | 42.9 | 21 | 263 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah State | 395 | 42.9 | 21 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30
Primary metric
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 61.5 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Fresno State
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 48.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Utah State
395 primary output · 42.9 efficiency · 21 usage
50.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Utah State
50.5
395 primary · 42.9 efficiency · 21 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Utah State
38.7
132 primary · 51.5 efficiency · 8.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.7833
Boyd Anderson · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
527
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.