Usage Score
10.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Georgia Tech
Dennis Andrews
WR • 6'0" • Tallahassee, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dennis Andrews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.7
Consistency
65.9
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
12131314141616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech • Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dennis Andrews, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Dennis Andrews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 428 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Georgia Tech, Middle Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35.7
Efficiency
82.7
Usage
10.6
Consistency
65.9
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 58. Unknown: 51. Bowling Green: 34. Louisiana Tech: 67. North Texas: 11. Western Kentucky: 47. Missouri: 65. Florida International: 12. UTSA: 40. Marshall: 27. Charlotte: 16. Florida Atlantic: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 4 by 96.7. Unknown: 4 by 85. Bowling Green: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 73.3. Western Kentucky: 4 by 78.3. Missouri: 5 by 86.7. Florida International: 1 by 80. UTSA: 4 by 66.7. Marshall: 2 by 90. Charlotte: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins29.3 · n=7 · -13.7 vs Losses
Losses43 · n=4 · +13.7 vs Wins
First Half44.7 · n=6 · +18.0 vs Second Half
Second Half26.7 · n=6 · -18.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/25 | vs Hawai'i | L 35-52 | — | 4 | 58 | 10.7 | 14.50 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 77-56 | — | — | — | 6.3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Charlotte | W 38-31 | — | 2 | 16 | 6.7 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Marshall | L 17-42 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs UTSA | L 25-45 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Florida International | W 42-35 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Missouri2+ TD | W 51-45 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 23 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Western Kentucky | L 43-44 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ North Texas | W 30-13 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 38-34 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Bowling Green | W 41-21 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2012-2014
Opening stop
- 2
Middle Tennessee
2016
Final stop
Season Progression
2012201320132014201420162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 37 | 100 | 33.3 | 37 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 37 | 100 | 33.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | 0 | -37 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 428 | 82.7 | 10.6 | 428 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 428 | 82.7 | 10.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37
Primary metric
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Hawai'i
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
51
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 85 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
428 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 10.6 usage
60.8
#2
2016 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
60.8
428 primary · 82.7 efficiency · 10.6 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Georgia Tech
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
465
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.