Usage Score
29.1
Player Dossier
2012-2013Arizona
B.J. Denker
QB • 6'3" • Torrance, CA, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
B.J. Denker is a pass-first distributor with 29.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
65.3
Consistency
81.7
Season Value
69
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Arizona
121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
B.J. Denker, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Arizona. B.J. Denker is a pass-first distributor with 29.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Arizona paired 3,465 primary output with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 65.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Arizona
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
266.5
Efficiency
65.3
Usage
29.1
Consistency
81.7
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 326. Unknown: 158. UNLV: 144. UTSA: 248. Washington: 175. USC: 359. Utah: 219. Colorado: 457. California: 305. UCLA: 268. Washington State: 264. Oregon: 280. Arizona State: 262
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 38 by 75.7. Unknown: 26 by 69.9. UNLV: 38 by 51.8. UTSA: 31 by 79.8. Washington: 46 by 49.1. USC: 55 by 58.1. Utah: 43 by 61.5. Colorado: 47 by 80.5. California: 53 by 62.4. UCLA: 49 by 61.7. Washington State: 55 by 62.5. Oregon: 36 by 81.7. Arizona State: 45 by 54.2
Split Comparison
Wins282.7 · n=7 · +17.1 vs Losses
Losses265.6 · n=5 · -17.1 vs Wins
First Half232.7 · n=7 · -73.3 vs Second Half
Second Half306 · n=6 · +73.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Oregon
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Boston College3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-19 | 17 | 24 | 275 | 70.8 | 2 | 0 | 75.7 | 14 | 51 | 3.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Arizona StateDual-threat | L 21-58 | 15 | 30 | 175 | 50.0 | 0 | 3 | 54.2 | 15 | 87 | 5.80 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs OregonDual-threat | W 42-16 | 19 | 22 | 178 | 86.4 | 2 | 0 | 81.7 | 14 | 102 | 7.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Washington StateDual-threat | L 17-24 | 26 | 38 | 200 | 68.4 | 1 | 0 | 62.5 | 17 | 64 | 3.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs UCLADual-threat | L 26-31 | 20 | 33 | 186 | 60.6 | 2 | 1 | 61.7 | 16 | 82 | 5.10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ California3+ TD | W 33-28 | 24 | 38 | 261 | 63.2 | 1 | 0 | 62.4 | 15 | 44 | 2.90 | 3 | 17 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ ColoradoDual-threat | W 44-20 | 21 | 32 | 265 | 65.6 | 1 | 1 | 80.5 | 15 | 192 | 12.80 | 0 | 54 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Utah3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 35-24 | 18 | 30 | 168 | 60.0 | 1 | 0 | 61.5 | 13 | 51 | 3.90 | 2 | 16 |
| Fri 10/11 | @ USC300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 31-38 | 28 | 44 | 363 | 63.6 | 4 | 0 | 58.1 | 11 | -4 | -0.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ WashingtonDual-threat | L 13-31 | 14 | 35 | 119 | 40.0 | 0 | 2 | 49.1 | 11 | 56 | 5.10 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs UTSA3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-13 | 14 | 21 | 158 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 79.8 | 10 | 90 | 9 | 2 | 35 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ UNLVDual-threat | W 58-13 | 8 | 21 | 81 | 38.1 | 0 | 0 | 51.8 | 17 | 63 | 3.70 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 9 | 13 | 87 | 69.2 | 1 | 0 | 69.9 | 13 | 71 | 5.50 | 1 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Arizona | 333 | 60.8 | 10.5 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | Arizona | 3,465 | 65.3 | 29.1 | 3,132 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Arizona | 3,465 | 65.3 | 29.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
457
Primary metric
457 total offense with 80.5 efficiency.
#2
Colorado
180
Primary metric
Win with 180 yards of offense and 78.9 efficiency.
180 total offense with 78.9 efficiency.
#3
Boston College
326
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
326 total offense with 75.7 efficiency.
#4
USC
359
Primary metric
Loss with 359 yards of offense and 58.1 efficiency.
359 total offense with 58.1 efficiency.
#5
Oregon
280
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
280 total offense with 81.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Arizona
3,465 primary output · 65.3 efficiency · 29.1 usage
69
#2
2013 Regular Season · Arizona
69
3,465 primary · 65.3 efficiency · 29.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Arizona
28.9
333 primary · 60.8 efficiency · 10.5 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,798
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.