Usage Score
14.5
Player Dossier
2025-2025Central Michigan
Collin Payne
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Lake Forest, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Collin Payne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60
Consistency
32.8
Season Value
51.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Collin Payne, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan. Collin Payne reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Central Michigan paired 87 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
60
Usage
14.5
Consistency
32.8
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 3. Pittsburgh: 18. Akron: 3. Bowling Green: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 1 by 20. Pittsburgh: 1 by 100. Akron: 1 by 20. Bowling Green: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins33 · n=2 · +22.5 vs Losses
Losses10.5 · n=2 · -22.5 vs Wins
First Half10.5 · n=2 · -22.5 vs Second Half
Second Half33 · n=2 · +22.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 87 | 60 | 14.5 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
San José State
3
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
3
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
87 primary output · 60 efficiency · 14.5 usage
51.5
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
87
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 4 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.