Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2025-2025Tulsa
Lento Smith Jr.
S • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Harvey, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Lento Smith Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.3
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
14.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lento Smith Jr., S. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tulsa. Lento Smith Jr. shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 7 primary output with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
33.3
Usage
6.7
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. New Mexico State: 1. Navy: 0. Oklahoma State: 4. Tulane: 0. Memphis: 0. East Carolina: 1. Temple: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Oregon State: 0. Army: 1. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. New Mexico State: 3 by 22.5. Navy: 9 by 37.5. Oklahoma State: 10 by 81.7. Tulane: 6 by 25. Memphis: 9 by 37.5. East Carolina: 8 by 43.3. Temple: 7 by 29.2. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 25. Oregon State: 6 by 25. Army: 6 by 35. UAB: 6 by 25
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=3 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · n=8 · -1.4 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=6 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs UAB | L 24-31 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Army | W 26-25 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oregon State | W 31-14 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 21-40 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Temple | L 37-38 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/16 | @ East Carolina | L 27-41 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 10/5 | @ Memphis | L 7-45 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tulane | L 14-31 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State10+ tackles | W 19-12 | 10 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Navy | L 23-42 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/7 | @ New Mexico State | L 14-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulsa | 7 | 33.3 | 6.7 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.1 takeover score.
#2
Army
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.7 takeover score.
#3
East Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.3 takeover score.
#4
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 18.2 takeover score.
#5
Memphis
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 14.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
7 primary output · 33.3 efficiency · 6.7 usage
14.9
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
79
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.