Player Dossier

2024-2025

UTSA

Will Henderson III

RB • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Gilmer, TX, USA

Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover

Will Henderson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.7 efficiency.

Usage Score

19

Efficiency

63.7

Consistency

61.9

Season Value

61.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA

24242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
UTSA
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Will Henderson III, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. Will Henderson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.7 efficiency.

Will Henderson III played RB for UTSA. Across 2 tracked seasons, Will Henderson III recorded 960 rushing yards, 148 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

UTSA paired 998 primary output with 63.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 63.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte

Win with 191 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · UTSA

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

76.8

Efficiency

63.7

Usage

19

Consistency

61.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida International

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 99. Texas A&M: 25. Texas State: 65. Unknown: 41. Colorado State: 28. Temple: 52. Rice: 115. North Texas: 65. Tulane: 82. South Florida: 32. Charlotte: 191. East Carolina: 138. Army: 65

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 15 by 53.8. Texas A&M: 8 by 23.7. Texas State: 8 by 83.9. Unknown: 13 by 31.9. Colorado State: 8 by 35.1. Temple: 12 by 44.3. Rice: 5 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 100. Tulane: 15 by 49.9. South Florida: 6 by 56. Charlotte: 20 by 89.8. East Carolina: 21 by 75.4. Army: 8 by 83.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins108.8 · Games = 6 · +58.2 vs Losses
Losses50.7 · Games = 6 · -58.2 vs Wins
First Half60.7 · Games = 7 · -34.8 vs Second Half
Second Half95.5 · Games = 6 · +34.8 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

Charlotte

Best efficiency game

100 vs North Texas

Result
Sat 12/27vs Florida International2+ TDW 57-2014594.2021406.6
Sat 11/29vs ArmyL 24-276589.700278.1
Sat 11/22vs East Carolina100 rush yardsW 58-24191467.7002-86.6
Sat 11/15@ Charlotte100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yardsW 28-7191859.701169.6
Fri 11/7@ South FloridaL 23-555275.400155.3
Thu 10/30vs Tulane2+ TDW 48-2612524.3013305.5
Sat 10/18@ North TexasL 17-5556513013
Sat 10/11vs Rice100 rush yards · 2+ TDW 61-13511523223
Sat 10/4@ TempleL 21-2710424.2002104.3
Sun 9/21@ Colorado StateW 17-167233.300153.5
Sat 9/13vs Unknown113330283.2
Sat 9/6vs Texas StateL 36-435499.8003168.1
Sat 8/30@ Texas A&ML 24-427121.7001133.1

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    UTSA

    2024-2025

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2024 PostseasonUTSA11034.36
2024 Regular SeasonUTSA11034.360
2025 PostseasonUTSA99863.719888
2025 Regular SeasonUTSA99863.7190

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Charlotte

Win with 191 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

191

Primary metric

191 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.

#2

Coastal Carolina

81

Primary metric

Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

81 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.

#3

East Carolina

138

Primary metric

Win with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

138 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.

#4

Rice

115

Primary metric

Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

115 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.

#5

North Texas

65

Primary metric

Loss with 65 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

65 scrimmage yards and 10.6 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2025 Postseason · UTSA

998 primary output · 63.7 efficiency · 19 usage

61.1

#2

2025 Regular Season · UTSA

61.1

998 primary · 63.7 efficiency · 19 usage

#3

2024 Postseason · UTSA

17.1

110 primary · 34.3 efficiency · 6 usage

Milestones

3

100+ rush yards

1

150+ scrimmage yards

3

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2024 · Rating 0.88

Gilmer · Gilmer, TX

Committed To
UTSA
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2024

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

1,108

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.