Usage Score
19
Player Dossier
2024-2025UTSA
RB • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Gilmer, TX, USA
Will Henderson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
19
Efficiency
63.7
Consistency
61.9
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Henderson III, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · UTSA. Will Henderson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 63.7 efficiency.
Will Henderson III played RB for UTSA. Across 2 tracked seasons, Will Henderson III recorded 960 rushing yards, 148 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
UTSA paired 998 primary output with 63.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 63.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Win with 191 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
76.8
Efficiency
63.7
Usage
19
Consistency
61.9
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 99. Texas A&M: 25. Texas State: 65. Unknown: 41. Colorado State: 28. Temple: 52. Rice: 115. North Texas: 65. Tulane: 82. South Florida: 32. Charlotte: 191. East Carolina: 138. Army: 65
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 15 by 53.8. Texas A&M: 8 by 23.7. Texas State: 8 by 83.9. Unknown: 13 by 31.9. Colorado State: 8 by 35.1. Temple: 12 by 44.3. Rice: 5 by 100. North Texas: 5 by 100. Tulane: 15 by 49.9. South Florida: 6 by 56. Charlotte: 20 by 89.8. East Carolina: 21 by 75.4. Army: 8 by 83.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Florida International2+ TD | W 57-20 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 2 | 1 | 40 | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Army | L 24-27 | 6 | 58 | 9.70 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8.1 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs East Carolina100 rush yards | W 58-24 | 19 | 146 | 7.70 | 0 | 2 | -8 | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Charlotte100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-7 | 19 | 185 | 9.70 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 9.6 |
| Fri 11/7 | @ South Florida | L 23-55 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5.3 |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Tulane2+ TD | W 48-26 | 12 | 52 | 4.30 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ North Texas | L 17-55 | 5 | 65 | 13 | 0 | — | — | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Rice100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 61-13 | 5 | 115 | 23 | 2 | — | — | 23 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Temple | L 21-27 | 10 | 42 | 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 4.3 |
| Sun 9/21 | @ Colorado State | W 17-16 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3.5 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 3.2 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Texas State | L 36-43 | 5 | 49 | 9.80 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 8.1 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-42 | 7 | 12 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 110 | 34.3 | 6 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 110 | 34.3 | 6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | UTSA | 998 | 63.7 | 19 | 888 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTSA | 998 | 63.7 | 19 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Charlotte
Win with 191 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
191
Primary metric
191 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#2
Coastal Carolina
81
Primary metric
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
#3
East Carolina
138
Primary metric
Win with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#4
Rice
115
Primary metric
Win with 115 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
115 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#5
North Texas
65
Primary metric
Loss with 65 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
65 scrimmage yards and 10.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · UTSA
998 primary output · 63.7 efficiency · 19 usage
61.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTSA
61.1
998 primary · 63.7 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · UTSA
17.1
110 primary · 34.3 efficiency · 6 usage
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.88
Gilmer · Gilmer, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,108
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.