Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2024-2025Army
Briggs Bartosh
RB • 5'10" • 213 lbs • Riverside, MO, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Briggs Bartosh leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.3 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.3
Consistency
32.8
Season Value
48.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Army
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Briggs Bartosh, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Army. Briggs Bartosh leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.3 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Army paired 262 primary output with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Army
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
37.4
Efficiency
50.3
Usage
10.2
Consistency
32.8
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 11. North Texas: 99. East Carolina: 14. UAB: 8. Charlotte: 25. Tulane: 23. Air Force: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 3 by 38.2. North Texas: 8 by 100. East Carolina: 6 by 24.3. UAB: 2 by 41.7. Charlotte: 6 by 43.4. Tulane: 7 by 34.2. Air Force: 12 by 70.5
Split Comparison
Wins31.5 · n=4 · -13.8 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · n=3 · +13.8 vs Wins
First Half33 · n=4 · -10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half43.3 · n=3 · +10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 262 | 50.3 | 10.2 | 262 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
99
Primary metric
99 scrimmage yards and 10.8 usage.
#2
Air Force
82
Primary metric
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82 scrimmage yards and 24 usage.
#3
Charlotte
25
Primary metric
Win with 25 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
25 scrimmage yards and 9.2 usage.
#4
Tulane
23
Primary metric
Loss with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
23 scrimmage yards and 10 usage.
#5
UAB
8
Primary metric
Win with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 3.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Army
262 primary output · 50.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
48.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
262
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.