Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2024-2025Clemson
WR • 6'3" • 200 lbs • Key West, FL, USA
T.J. Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.5
Efficiency
80.9
Consistency
67.4
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Moore, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Clemson. T.J. Moore reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Clemson paired 837 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
64.4
Efficiency
80.9
Usage
16.5
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 83. LSU: 55. Troy: 1. Georgia Tech: 16. Syracuse: 92. North Carolina: 108. Boston College: 11. SMU: 124. Duke: 92. Florida State: 37. Louisville: 68. Unknown: 49. South Carolina: 101
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 6 by 92.2. LSU: 4 by 91.7. Troy: 1 by 6.7. Georgia Tech: 2 by 53.3. Syracuse: 8 by 76.7. North Carolina: 5 by 100. Boston College: 1 by 73.3. SMU: 5 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Florida State: 3 by 82.2. Louisville: 6 by 75.6. Unknown: 3 by 100. South Carolina: 6 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Penn State | L 10-22 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ South Carolina100 receiving yards | W 28-14 | — | 6 | 101 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Louisville | W 20-19 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Florida State | W 24-10 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Duke | L 45-46 | — | 2 | 92 | 46 | 46 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 24-35 | — | 5 | 124 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 2 | 62 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Boston College | W 41-10 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ North Carolina100 receiving yards | W 38-10 | — | 5 | 108 | 21.6 | 21.60 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs SyracuseHigh volume | L 21-34 | — | 8 | 92 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Georgia Tech | L 21-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Troy | W 27-16 | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs LSU | L 10-17 | — | 4 | 55 | 12 | 13.80 | 0 | 26 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Clemson | 651 | 84.4 | 13 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Clemson | 651 | 84.4 | 13 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Clemson | 837 | 80.9 | 16.5 | 186 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Clemson | 837 | 80.9 | 16.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116
Primary metric
116 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
124
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Carolina
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Carolina
108
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Clemson
837 primary output · 80.9 efficiency · 16.5 usage
66.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Clemson
66.2
837 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Clemson
62.4
651 primary · 84.4 efficiency · 13 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.9887
Tampa Catholic · Tampa, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,488
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
T.J. Moore quick answers
Recruiting profile
5-star recruit