Usage Score
11.5
Player Dossier
2025-2025East Carolina
Chaston Ditta
QB • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chaston Ditta is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.1
Consistency
22.2
Season Value
47.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chaston Ditta, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · East Carolina. Chaston Ditta is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
East Carolina paired 202 primary output with 57.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with 160 yards of offense and 58.5 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · East Carolina
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
50.5
Efficiency
57.1
Usage
11.5
Consistency
22.2
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 160. Unknown: 36. Charlotte: 6. UTSA: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 27 by 58.5. Unknown: 4 by 83.3. Charlotte: 4 by 32.5. UTSA: 3 by 54.2
Split Comparison
Wins83 · n=2
First Half98 · n=2 · +95 vs Second Half
Second Half3 · n=2 · -95 vs First Half
All Games50.5 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Unknown
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | East Carolina | 202 | 57.1 | 11.5 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | East Carolina | 202 | 57.1 | 11.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with 160 yards of offense and 58.5 efficiency.
160
Primary metric
160 total offense with 58.5 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
36
Primary metric
Game with 36 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
36 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#3
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards of offense and 54.2 efficiency.
0 total offense with 54.2 efficiency.
#4
Charlotte
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 yards of offense and 32.5 efficiency.
6 total offense with 32.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · East Carolina
202 primary output · 57.1 efficiency · 11.5 usage
47.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · East Carolina
47.7
202 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 11.5 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
1
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8389
Lake Travis · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
202
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 4 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.