Usage Score
15
Player Dossier
2011-2014Marshall
TE • 6'7" • Stafford, VA, USA
Eric Frohnapfel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
48.9
Season Value
58.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Marshall
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Frohnapfel, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Marshall. Eric Frohnapfel reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Marshall paired 420 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
32.3
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
15
Consistency
48.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 16. Miami (OH): 54. Ohio: 9. Akron: 32. Old Dominion: 30. Middle Tennessee: 28. Florida International: 25. Florida Atlantic: 47. Southern Miss: 22. Rice: 107. UAB: 21. Western Kentucky: 14. Louisiana Tech: 15
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 2 by 53.3. Miami (OH): 5 by 72. Ohio: 1 by 60. Akron: 3 by 71.1. Old Dominion: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 93.3. Florida International: 3 by 55.6. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 78.3. Southern Miss: 2 by 73.3. Rice: 6 by 100. UAB: 2 by 70. Western Kentucky: 3 by 31.1. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | @ Northern Illinois | W 52-23 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 26-23 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Western Kentucky2+ TD | L 66-67 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 2 | 7 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ UAB | W 23-18 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Rice100 receiving yards | W 41-14 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Southern Miss | W 63-17 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 35-16 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Florida International | W 45-13 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 49-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Old Dominion | W 56-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Akron | W 48-17 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Ohio | W 44-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Miami (OH)2+ TD | W 42-27 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 2 | 29 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Marshall
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Marshall | 68 | 53.9 | 8.6 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Marshall | 129 | 56.7 | 5.7 | 61 |
| 2013 Postseason | Marshall | 95 | 64 | 6.9 | -34 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Marshall | 95 | 64 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Marshall | 420 | 69.8 | 15 | 325 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Marshall | 420 | 69.8 | 15 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
West Virginia
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Marshall
420 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 15 usage
58.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Marshall
58.4
420 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 15 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Marshall
38.6
68 primary · 53.9 efficiency · 8.6 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8403
Colonial Forge · Stafford, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
712
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Eric Frohnapfel quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit