Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
Seth Grubb
WR • 5'9" • La Vernia, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Seth Grubb reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
76.3
Season Value
51.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA
121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Seth Grubb, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA. Seth Grubb reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTSA paired 228 primary output with 83.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
25.3
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
5.8
Consistency
76.3
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 34. Florida Atlantic: 12. North Texas: 30
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 80. North Texas: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins32 · n=2
First Half23 · n=2
All Games25.3 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 17 | 50 | 5.5 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 228 | 83.7 | 7 | 211 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 76 | 93.3 | 5.8 | -152 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
18
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
228 primary output · 83.7 efficiency · 7 usage
60.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
51.4
76 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 5.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
17.6
17 primary · 50 efficiency · 5.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
321
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.