Usage Score
21.7
Player Dossier
2013-2015UTSA
David Morgan II
TE • 6'4" • Marble Falls, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
David Morgan II reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.2
Consistency
63.8
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA
131415
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Morgan II, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · UTSA. David Morgan II reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
UTSA paired 566 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
47.2
Efficiency
76.2
Usage
21.7
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 109. Kansas State: 45. Oklahoma State: 46. Colorado State: 22. UTEP: 45. Louisiana Tech: 85. Southern Miss: 9. North Texas: 32. Old Dominion: 57. Charlotte: 6. Rice: 76. Middle Tennessee: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 9 by 80.7. Kansas State: 4 by 75. Oklahoma State: 2 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 73.3. UTEP: 3 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 63. Southern Miss: 1 by 60. North Texas: 3 by 71.1. Old Dominion: 5 by 76. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Rice: 3 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 75.6
Split Comparison
Wins42.3 · n=3 · -6.4 vs Losses
Losses48.8 · n=9 · +6.4 vs Wins
First Half58.7 · n=6 · +23 vs Second Half
Second Half35.7 · n=6 · -23 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 7-42 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Rice | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 76 | 25.3 | 25.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Charlotte | W 30-27 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Old Dominion | L 31-36 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ North Texas | L 23-30 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Southern Miss | L 10-32 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Louisiana TechHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 31-34 | — | 9 | 85 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 2 | 16 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ UTEP | W 25-6 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Colorado State | L 31-33 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-69 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Kansas State | L 3-30 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | L 32-42 | — | 9 | 109 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 1 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201320142015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 69 | 70.7 | 5.7 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 255 | 80.2 | 15.2 | 186 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 566 | 76.2 | 21.7 | 311 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 80.7 efficiency score.
#3
Oklahoma State
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 63 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
566 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 21.7 usage
65.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
47
255 primary · 80.2 efficiency · 15.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
38.1
69 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
890
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.