Usage Score
12.4
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
Marcellus Mack
WR • 6'0" • Giddings, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Marcellus Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.6
Consistency
53
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UTSA
121314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcellus Mack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UTSA. Marcellus Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
UTSA paired 279 primary output with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
27.9
Efficiency
77.6
Usage
12.4
Consistency
53
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 37. Arizona: 5. Oklahoma State: 22. Florida Atlantic: 23. New Mexico: 77. Louisiana Tech: 17. Rice: 9. Southern Miss: 43. Western Kentucky: 14. North Texas: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 82.2. Arizona: 1 by 33.3. Oklahoma State: 2 by 73.3. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 76.7. New Mexico: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 100. Rice: 1 by 60. Southern Miss: 5 by 57.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 93.3. North Texas: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins37.3 · n=3 · +13.5 vs Losses
Losses23.9 · n=7 · -13.5 vs Wins
First Half32.8 · n=5 · +9.8 vs Second Half
Second Half23 · n=5 · -9.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | — | 1 | 14 | 13.5 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | W 12-10 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Houston | W 27-7 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 174 | 60.1 | 9.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 169 | 54.1 | 9.2 | -5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 279 | 77.6 | 12.4 | 110 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
52
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
North Texas
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 50 efficiency score.
#5
UAB
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
279 primary output · 77.6 efficiency · 12.4 usage
59.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
46.2
169 primary · 54.1 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
43.8
174 primary · 60.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
622
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.