Usage Score
17.4
Player Profile
Kam Jones
WR • 5'11" • Edna, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kam Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
44.6
Consistency
64
Season Value
40.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
121314
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Primary stop by seasons
- UTSA
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama
Kam Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. Kam Jones reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 323 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 44.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
19.3
Efficiency
44.6
Usage
17.4
Consistency
64
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 17. Arizona: 33. Oklahoma State: 4. Florida Atlantic: 14. New Mexico: 38. Florida International: 24. Louisiana Tech: 24. UTEP: 14. Rice: -3. Southern Miss: 36. Western Kentucky: 11. North Texas: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 4 by 28.3. Arizona: 3 by 73.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 26.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 46.7. New Mexico: 3 by 84.4. Florida International: 4 by 40. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 80. UTEP: 2 by 46.7. Rice: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 6 by 40. Western Kentucky: 3 by 24.4. North Texas: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins24.3 · n=4 · +7.4 vs Losses
Losses16.9 · n=8 · -7.4 vs Wins
First Half21.7 · n=6 · +4.7 vs Second Half
Second Half17 · n=6 · -4.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
84.4 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.5 | 6.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | — | 3 | 11 | 0.3 | 3.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | W 12-10 | — | 6 | 36 | 5.9 | 6 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | — | 1 | -3 | 3.5 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | — | 2 | 14 | 3.8 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | — | 2 | 24 | 5.6 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | — | 4 | 24 | 5.5 | 6 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | — | 2 | 14 | 4.2 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | — | 1 | 4 | 1.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | — | 3 | 33 | 7.2 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Houston | W 27-7 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.8 | 4.30 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 323 | 78.5 | 13.4 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 345 | 60.7 | 14.6 | 22 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 232 | 44.6 | 17.4 | -113 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Alabama
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
323 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 13.4 usage
50.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
45.3
345 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
40.4
232 primary · 44.6 efficiency · 17.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
900
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.