Usage Score
20.6
Player Dossier
2011-2013Texas A&M
Mike Evans
WR • 6'5" • Galveston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mike Evans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.1
Consistency
44.2
Season Value
63.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
1112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Evans, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Texas A&M. Mike Evans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,105 primary output with 81 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
107.2
Efficiency
88.1
Usage
20.6
Consistency
44.2
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 72. Rice: 84. Unknown: 155. Alabama: 279. SMU: 57. Arkansas: 116. Ole Miss: 46. Auburn: 287. Vanderbilt: 77. UTEP: 46. Mississippi State: 116. LSU: 51. Missouri: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 4 by 100. Rice: 6 by 93.3. Unknown: 7 by 100. Alabama: 7 by 100. SMU: 2 by 100. Arkansas: 6 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 76.7. Auburn: 11 by 100. Vanderbilt: 5 by 100. UTEP: 4 by 76.7. Mississippi State: 5 by 100. LSU: 4 by 85. Missouri: 4 by 13.3
Split Comparison
Wins76.8 · n=8 · -79.5 vs Losses
Losses156.3 · n=4 · +79.5 vs Wins
First Half115.6 · n=7 · +18.1 vs Second Half
Second Half97.5 · n=6 · -18.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Duke | W 52-48 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Missouri | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ LSU | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards | W 51-41 | — | 5 | 116 | 23.2 | 23.20 | 0 | 75 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs UTEP | W 57-7 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 56-24 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 2 | 43 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-45 | — | 11 | 287 | 26.1 | 26.10 | 4 | 64 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Ole Miss | W 41-38 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-33 | — | 6 | 116 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 2 | 49 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs SMU | W 42-13 | — | 2 | 57 | 28.5 | 28.50 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Alabama100 receiving yards | L 42-49 | — | 7 | 279 | 39.9 | 39.90 | 1 | 95 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 7 | 155 | 22.1 | 22.10 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Rice2+ TD | W 52-31 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,105 | 81 | 26 | 1,105 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,105 | 81 | 26 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,394 | 88.1 | 20.6 | 289 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,394 | 88.1 | 20.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
287
Primary metric
287 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Alabama
279
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
279 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ole Miss
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,105 primary output · 81 efficiency · 26 usage
67.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Texas A&M
67.7
1,105 primary · 81 efficiency · 26 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
63.2
1,394 primary · 88.1 efficiency · 20.6 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8656
Riverdale · Murfreesboro, TN
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,499
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.