Usage Score
19
Player Profile
Travis Labhart
WR • 5'9" • Dallas, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Travis Labhart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
64.7
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
11121313
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas A&M
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Travis Labhart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Texas A&M. Travis Labhart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 626 primary output with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
56.9
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
19
Consistency
64.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 76. Unknown: 40. Alabama: 12. Arkansas: 0. Ole Miss: 97. Auburn: 79. Vanderbilt: 29. UTEP: 83. Mississippi State: 102. LSU: 27. Missouri: 81
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 7 by 72.4. Unknown: 2 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 80. Ole Miss: 8 by 80.8. Auburn: 7 by 75.2. Vanderbilt: 5 by 38.7. UTEP: 4 by 100. Mississippi State: 6 by 100. LSU: 4 by 45. Missouri: 7 by 77.1
Split Comparison
Wins64.5 · n=6 · +14.8 vs Losses
Losses49.8 · n=4 · -14.8 vs Wins
First Half50.7 · n=6 · -13.7 vs Second Half
Second Half64.4 · n=5 · +13.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Duke2+ TD | W 52-48 | — | 7 | 76 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 3 | 23 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Missouri | L 21-28 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ LSU | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Mississippi State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-41 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 33 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs UTEP2+ TD | W 57-7 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Vanderbilt | W 56-24 | — | 5 | 29 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn | L 41-45 | — | 7 | 79 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Ole MissHigh volume | W 41-38 | — | 8 | 97 | 12.1 | 12.10 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Arkansas | W 45-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Alabama | L 42-49 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 626 | 76.9 | 19 | 626 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 626 | 76.9 | 19 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102
Primary metric
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 80.8 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Missouri
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 77.1 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 75.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
626 primary output · 76.9 efficiency · 19 usage
65.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · Texas A&M
65.2
626 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 19 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
626
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.