Player Dossier

2011-2014

TCU

David Porter

WR • DeSoto, TX, USA

Reliable chain-moverPossession profile

David Porter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

13.7

Efficiency

64

Consistency

48.9

Season Value

54.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · TCU

111112131414

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
6
Program Path
TCU
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

David Porter, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · TCU. David Porter reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

TCU paired 392 primary output with 64 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 64 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · TCU

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

35.6

Efficiency

64

Usage

13.7

Consistency

48.9

Best Game by takeover score

Ole Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 15. Unknown: 54. Minnesota: 59. SMU: 30. Oklahoma: 19. Baylor: 25. Oklahoma State: 18. Kansas State: 84. Kansas: 67. Texas: 7. Iowa State: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 3 by 33.3. Unknown: 5 by 72. Minnesota: 5 by 78.7. SMU: 2 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 55.6. Oklahoma State: 3 by 40. Kansas State: 7 by 80. Kansas: 6 by 74.4. Texas: 2 by 23.3. Iowa State: 2 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Wins34.8 · n=9
First Half33.7 · n=6 · -4.3 vs Second Half
Second Half38 · n=5 · +4.3 vs First Half
All Games35.6 · n=11

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Kansas State

Best efficiency game

100 vs Oklahoma

Result
Wed 12/31vs Ole MissW 42-331555012
Sat 12/6vs Iowa StateW 55-321477011
Fri 11/28@ TexasW 48-10273.53.5014
Sat 11/15@ KansasW 34-3066711.211.20025
Sun 11/9vs Kansas StateW 41-207841212134
Sat 10/18vs Oklahoma StateW 42-93186609
Sat 10/11@ BaylorL 58-613258.38.30011
Sat 10/4vs OklahomaW 37-331191919019
Sat 9/27@ SMUW 56-02301515015
Sat 9/13vs MinnesotaW 30-755911.811.80020
Sat 8/30vs Unknown55410.810.80119

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    TCU

    2011-2014

    Opening stop

Season Progression

201120112012201320142014
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2011 PostseasonTCU109827.9
2011 Regular SeasonTCU109827.90
2012 Regular SeasonTCU0-109
2013 Regular SeasonTCU00
2014 PostseasonTCU3926413.7392
2014 Regular SeasonTCU3926413.70

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Kansas State

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

84

Primary metric

84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.

#2

Wyoming

33

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Air Force

29

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.

#4

Kansas

67

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

67 receiving yards with a 74.4 efficiency score.

#5

Minnesota

59

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2014 Postseason · TCU

392 primary output · 64 efficiency · 13.7 usage

54.1

#2

2014 Regular Season · TCU

54.1

392 primary · 64 efficiency · 13.7 usage

#3

2011 Postseason · TCU

48.5

109 primary · 82 efficiency · 7.9 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2021 · Rating 0.8759

Memorial · Eau Claire, WI

Committed To
Wisconsin
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2021

Career Facts

1

Career teams

6

Seasons tracked

501

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

David Porter quick answers

Recruiting profile

3-star recruit

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
6
Career receiving yards
501