Usage Score
12.5
Player Profile
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Columbia, SC, USA
Noah Jennings reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.5
Efficiency
79.3
Consistency
68.7
Season Value
65.1
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Cincinnati
Quick Facts
Noah Jennings, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Cincinnati. Noah Jennings reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 323 primary output with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
29.4
Efficiency
79.3
Usage
12.5
Consistency
68.7
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 5. Bowling Green: 28. Unknown: 15. Kansas: 36. Iowa State: 42. UCF: 12. Oklahoma State: 63. Baylor: 23. Utah: 28. BYU: 29. TCU: 42
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 1 by 33.3. Bowling Green: 2 by 93.3. Unknown: 2 by 50. Kansas: 3 by 80. Iowa State: 2 by 100. UCF: 1 by 80. Oklahoma State: 3 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 76.7. Utah: 3 by 62.2. BYU: 2 by 96.7. TCU: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs TCU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | vs Navy | L 13-35 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ TCU | L 23-45 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs BYU | L 14-26 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/2 | @ Utah | L 14-45 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Baylor | W 41-20 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Oklahoma State | W 49-17 | — | 3 | 63 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs UCF | W 20-11 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Iowa State | W 38-30 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Kansas | W 37-34 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 34-20 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Cincinnati | 323 | 79.3 | 12.5 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 323 | 79.3 | 12.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
29
Primary metric
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa State
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Cincinnati
323 primary output · 79.3 efficiency · 12.5 usage
65.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · Cincinnati
65.1
323 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 12.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
323
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Noah Jennings quick answers