Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Stanford
Devon Cajuste
WR • 6'4" • Seaford, NY, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devon Cajuste reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.7
Consistency
33
Season Value
47.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford
1112131314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devon Cajuste, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Stanford. Devon Cajuste reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Stanford paired 557 primary output with 91.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Stanford
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
31.9
Efficiency
75.7
Usage
16.1
Consistency
33
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 8. Northwestern: 39. UCF: 24. USC: 21. Oregon State: 18. Arizona: 49. UCLA: 16. Washington: 10. Oregon: 37. California: 18. Notre Dame: 125. USC: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 1 by 53.3. Northwestern: 4 by 65. UCF: 2 by 80. USC: 2 by 70. Oregon State: 2 by 60. Arizona: 3 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 53.3. Washington: 1 by 66.7. Oregon: 2 by 100. California: 2 by 60. Notre Dame: 5 by 100. USC: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins30.7 · n=10 · -7.3 vs Losses
Losses38 · n=2 · +7.3 vs Wins
First Half26.5 · n=6 · -10.8 vs Second Half
Second Half37.3 · n=6 · +10.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Iowa | W 45-16 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs USC | W 41-22 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Notre Dame100 receiving yards | W 38-36 | — | 5 | 125 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 42 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs California | W 35-22 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Oregon | L 36-38 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs Washington | W 31-14 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 10/16 | vs UCLA | W 56-35 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Arizona | W 55-17 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Oregon State | W 42-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ USC | W 41-31 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs UCF | W 31-7 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Northwestern | L 6-16 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 7 | 46.7 | 4 | 7 |
| 2013 Postseason | Stanford | 642 | 88 | 19.6 | 635 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Stanford | 642 | 88 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 557 | 91.9 | 18.1 | -85 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 557 | 91.9 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Stanford | 383 | 75.7 | 16.1 | -174 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 383 | 75.7 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
116
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona State
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Stanford
557 primary output · 91.9 efficiency · 18.1 usage
69.9
#2
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
69.9
557 primary · 91.9 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Stanford
68.5
642 primary · 88 efficiency · 19.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,589
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.