Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2023-2025Toledo
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • Fremont, OH, USA
Bryson Hammer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryson Hammer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Toledo. Bryson Hammer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Toledo paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 0. Unknown: 0. Massachusetts: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Buffalo: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Central Michigan: 0. Ohio: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
— vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/26 | vs Pittsburgh | W 48-46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Ohio | L 7-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/13 | vs Central Michigan | W 37-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 29-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Bowling Green | L 26-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Buffalo | L 15-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Miami (OH) | W 30-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Western Kentucky | L 21-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Mississippi State | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Massachusetts | W 38-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Toledo | 41 | 83.4 | 5.7 | 41 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Toledo | 41 | 83.4 | 5.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21
Primary metric
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
20
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Pittsburgh
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Toledo
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Regular Season · Toledo
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2025 Postseason · Toledo
47.9
41 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 5.7 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
41
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Bryson Hammer quick answers