Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2013Utah
WR • 6'4" • Monterey Park, CA, USA
Anthony Denham reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
11%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
32
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
35
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
45
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Utah
Snapshot
Player Story
Anthony Denham built his college career from 2011 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Monterey Park, CA wearing No. 8, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Anthony Denham's career was his receiving role: 35...
Read the storyAnthony Denham, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Utah. Anthony Denham reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 7 | 11 | 135 | 0 | 57 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 10 | 24 | 291 | 2 | 59.6 |
Related Context
Anthony Denham played WR for Utah. Across 3 tracked seasons, Anthony Denham recorded 426 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Utah paired 291 primary output with 62.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 62.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
29.1
Efficiency
62.6
Usage
14.1
Consistency
28.9
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 113. Weber State: 16. Oregon State: 7. BYU: 6. UCLA: 61. Stanford: 17. Arizona: 2. USC: 42. Oregon: 19. Washington State: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 6 by 100. Weber State: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 1 by 46.7. BYU: 2 by 20. UCLA: 4 by 100. Stanford: 2 by 56.7. Arizona: 1 by 13.3. USC: 3 by 93.3. Oregon: 3 by 42.2. Washington State: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/23 | @ Washington State | L 37-49 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Oregon | L 21-44 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ USC | L 3-19 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ Arizona | L 24-35 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Stanford | W 27-21 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 10/4 | vs UCLA | L 27-34 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ BYU | W 20-13 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Sun 9/15 | vs Oregon State | L 48-51 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Weber State | W 70-7 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | W 30-26 | — | 6 | 113 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 51 |
Player Story
Anthony Denham built his college career from 2011 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Monterey Park, CA wearing No. 8, spending time with Utah. The clearest part of Anthony Denham's career was his receiving role: 35 catches, 426 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns across 17 career games in the available record. That gives Anthony Denham's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 135 | 81.1 | 8.4 | 135 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 291 | 62.6 | 14.1 | 156 |
#1 Featured game
vs Utah State
Week 1 · W 30-26
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Washington State
Week 10 · W 49-6 · Conference game
38
Receiving Yards
76.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#3
vs UCLA
Week 6 · L 27-34 · Conference game
61
Receiving Yards
71.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ USC
Week 9 · L 3-19 · Conference game
42
Receiving Yards
71.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
@ Colorado
Week 13 · W 42-35 · Conference game
20
Receiving Yards
59.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Utah
291 primary output · 62.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
59.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Utah
57
135 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Utah
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.