Usage Score
21.6
Player Dossier
2011-2014UCF
J.J. Worton
WR • 6'2" • Homestead, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
J.J. Worton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.9
Consistency
37.9
Season Value
52.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · UCF
111212131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UCF
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
J.J. Worton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · UCF. J.J. Worton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
UCF paired 721 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Regular Season · UCF
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
51.4
Efficiency
75.9
Usage
21.6
Consistency
37.9
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 83. Missouri: 32. Unknown: 35. Houston: 9. BYU: 22. Tulane: 21. Temple: 42. UConn: 178. Tulsa: 28. SMU: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 5 by 100. Missouri: 3 by 71.1. Unknown: 1 by 100. Houston: 1 by 60. BYU: 3 by 48.9. Tulane: 3 by 46.7. Temple: 4 by 70. UConn: 11 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 62.2. SMU: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins31 · n=6 · -66.7 vs Losses
Losses97.7 · n=3 · +66.7 vs Wins
First Half36.2 · n=5 · -30.4 vs Second Half
Second Half66.6 · n=5 · +30.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | vs SMU | W 53-7 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Tulsa | W 31-7 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 29-37 | — | 11 | 178 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 73 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Temple | W 34-14 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tulane | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs BYU | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 10/2 | @ Houston | W 17-12 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Missouri | L 10-38 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Penn State | L 24-26 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 0 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCF
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | UCF | 531 | 84.6 | 18.2 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | UCF | 594 | 76.6 | 19.6 | 63 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UCF | 594 | 76.6 | 19.6 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | UCF | 721 | 77.4 | 19.3 | 127 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCF | 721 | 77.4 | 19.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCF | 514 | 75.9 | 21.6 | -207 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
179
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 69.1 efficiency score.
#5
Florida International
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · UCF
721 primary output · 77.4 efficiency · 19.3 usage
60.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · UCF
60.9
721 primary · 77.4 efficiency · 19.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · UCF
59.2
531 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 18.2 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,360
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.