Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025SMU
Adam Moore
TE • 6'2" • 255 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Adam Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.9
Consistency
60.1
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · SMU
23232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adam Moore, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · SMU. Adam Moore reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
SMU paired 98 primary output with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · SMU
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
32.7
Efficiency
68.9
Usage
9.2
Consistency
60.1
Best Game by takeover score
Boston College
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 31. Tulsa: 66. Navy: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 100. Navy: 1 by 6.7
Split Comparison
Wins33.5 · n=2
First Half48.5 · n=2
All Games32.7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2023202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | SMU | 98 | 68.9 | 9.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | SMU | 98 | 68.9 | 9.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 40 | 12.5 | -86 |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -12 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boston College
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
12
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
1
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · SMU
98 primary output · 68.9 efficiency · 9.2 usage
59.5
#2
2023 Regular Season · SMU
59.5
98 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · SMU
42.5
12 primary · 40 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8636
Northwestern · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
110
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 4 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.