Usage Score
14
Player Profile
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Plano, TX, USA
Derek Eusebio reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14
Efficiency
71.7
Consistency
37.7
Season Value
55.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Arizona State
Quick Facts
Derek Eusebio, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Arizona State. Derek Eusebio reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Arizona State paired 341 primary output with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
37.9
Efficiency
71.7
Usage
14
Consistency
37.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 38. Baylor: 78. TCU: 15. Utah: 12. Texas Tech: 6. Houston: 12. West Virginia: 74. Colorado: 87. Arizona: 19
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 1 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 100. TCU: 1 by 100. Utah: 2 by 40. Texas Tech: 2 by 20. Houston: 2 by 40. West Virginia: 6 by 82.2. Colorado: 4 by 100. Arizona: 2 by 63.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Duke | L 39-42 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Arizona | L 7-23 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Colorado | W 42-17 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs West Virginia | W 25-23 | — | 6 | 74 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 10/26 | vs Houston | L 16-24 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas Tech | W 26-22 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Utah | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs TCU | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 15 | 7.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Baylor | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 78 | 22.3 | 39 | 0 | 61 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona State
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Arizona State | 64 | 100 | 5.3 | 64 |
| 2025 Postseason | Arizona State | 341 | 71.7 | 14 | 277 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arizona State | 341 | 71.7 | 14 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87
Primary metric
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
West Virginia
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
Baylor
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Duke
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Arizona State
341 primary output · 71.7 efficiency · 14 usage
55.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Arizona State
55.9
341 primary · 71.7 efficiency · 14 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Arizona State
43.9
64 primary · 100 efficiency · 5.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
405
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 11 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Derek Eusebio quick answers