Usage Score
12.9
Player Dossier
2011-2013SMU
RB • 5'9" • Bradenton, FL, USA
Jared Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage Score
12.9
Efficiency
45.1
Consistency
55.2
Season Value
53.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jared Williams, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · SMU. Jared Williams leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
SMU paired 207 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Scrimmage Yards / G
29.6
Efficiency
45.1
Usage
12.9
Consistency
55.2
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 40. UTEP: 26. Unknown: 27. Memphis: 12. Southern Miss: 1. Houston: 21. Rice: 80
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 11 by 37.9. UTEP: 3 by 86.1. Unknown: 4 by 49. Memphis: 3 by 41.7. Southern Miss: 1 by 10.4. Houston: 11 by 14.8. Rice: 11 by 75.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
86.1 vs UTEP
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | SMU | 207 | 45.1 | 12.9 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 207 | 45.1 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -207 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 80 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
80
Primary metric
80 scrimmage yards and 22 usage.
#2
UTEP
26
Primary metric
Win with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26 scrimmage yards and 7 usage.
#3
Pittsburgh
40
Primary metric
Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 23.4 usage.
#4
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
27 scrimmage yards and 7.8 usage.
#5
Houston
21
Primary metric
Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 22.4 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · SMU
207 primary output · 45.1 efficiency · 12.9 usage
53.3
#2
2011 Regular Season · SMU
53.3
207 primary · 45.1 efficiency · 12.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
207
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jared Williams quick answers