Usage Score
38.5
Player Dossier
2011-2014Kansas State
Tyler Lockett
WR • 5'11" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tyler Lockett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
74.6
Season Value
74.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Kansas State
11121213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Kansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Lockett, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Kansas State. Tyler Lockett reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Kansas State paired 1,515 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Kansas State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
116.5
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
38.5
Consistency
74.6
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 164. Unknown: 9. Iowa State: 136. Auburn: 45. UTEP: 84. Texas Tech: 125. Oklahoma: 86. Texas: 103. Oklahoma State: 94. TCU: 196. West Virginia: 196. Kansas: 119. Baylor: 158
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCLA: 13 by 84.1. Unknown: 1 by 60. Iowa State: 6 by 100. Auburn: 6 by 50. UTEP: 4 by 100. Texas Tech: 12 by 69.4. Oklahoma: 6 by 95.6. Texas: 8 by 85.8. Oklahoma State: 6 by 100. TCU: 11 by 100. West Virginia: 10 by 100. Kansas: 9 by 88.1. Baylor: 14 by 75.2
Split Comparison
Wins117.9 · n=8 · -22.9 vs Losses
Losses140.8 · n=4 · +22.9 vs Wins
First Half92.7 · n=7 · -51.6 vs Second Half
Second Half144.3 · n=6 · +51.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-40 | — | 13 | 164 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 2 | 29 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Baylor100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-38 | — | 14 | 158 | 10.8 | 11.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-13 | — | 9 | 119 | 12.3 | 13.20 | 2 | 44 |
| Fri 11/21 | @ West Virginia100 receiving yards · High volume | W 26-20 | — | 10 | 196 | 19.6 | 19.60 | 0 | 54 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ TCU100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-41 | — | 11 | 196 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 70 |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Oklahoma State | W 48-14 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 23-0 | — | 8 | 103 | 12.9 | 12.90 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Oklahoma | W 31-30 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-13 | — | 12 | 125 | 10.3 | 10.40 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs UTEP | W 58-28 | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 39 |
| Thu 9/18 | vs Auburn | L 14-20 | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Iowa State100 receiving yards | W 32-28 | — | 6 | 136 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 57 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kansas State
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Kansas State | 246 | 72.5 | 20.5 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Kansas State | 687 | 77.6 | 22 | 441 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Kansas State | 687 | 77.6 | 22 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,262 | 83.4 | 42.6 | 575 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,262 | 83.4 | 42.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Kansas State | 1,515 | 85.2 | 38.5 | 253 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Kansas State | 1,515 | 85.2 | 38.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
278
Primary metric
278 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas
237
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
237 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
TCU
196
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
196 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
West Virginia
196
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
196 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
West Virginia
194
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
194 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Kansas State
1,515 primary output · 85.2 efficiency · 38.5 usage
74.6
#2
2014 Regular Season · Kansas State
74.6
1,515 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 38.5 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Kansas State
69.6
1,262 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 42.6 usage
Milestones
17
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8652
Dublin Coffman · Dublin, OH
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,710
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.