Usage Score
27.1
Player Dossier
2023-2025Jacksonville State
Cam Vaughn
WR • 6'2" • 185 lbs • Villa Rica, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Cam Vaughn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.5
Consistency
42.8
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Jacksonville State
23242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Jacksonville State • West Virginia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cam Vaughn, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Jacksonville State. Cam Vaughn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Jacksonville State paired 804 primary output with 74.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Jacksonville State, West Virginia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Jacksonville State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
61.8
Efficiency
74.5
Usage
27.1
Consistency
42.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 184. Coastal Carolina: 13. Louisville: 3. Eastern Michigan: 94. Southern Miss: 17. Kennesaw State: 96. New Mexico State: 43. Middle Tennessee: 82. Liberty: 39. Louisiana Tech: 130. Sam Houston: 5. Western Kentucky: 7. Western Kentucky: 91
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 10 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 43.3. Louisville: 1 by 20. Eastern Michigan: 6 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 56.7. Kennesaw State: 7 by 91.4. New Mexico State: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 100. Liberty: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 100. Sam Houston: 1 by 33.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 23.3. Western Kentucky: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins62.9 · n=8 · +2.7 vs Losses
Losses60.2 · n=5 · -2.7 vs Wins
First Half64.3 · n=7 · +5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · n=6 · -5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/20 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-30 | — | 10 | 184 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Western Kentucky | W 52-12 | — | 4 | 91 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Western Kentucky | L 17-19 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Sam Houston | W 21-11 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-37 | — | 7 | 130 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 2 | 49 |
| Wed 10/30 | @ Liberty | W 31-21 | — | 1 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
| Wed 10/23 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 42-20 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 37 |
| Wed 10/9 | vs New Mexico State | W 54-13 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Fri 10/4 | @ Kennesaw State | W 63-24 | — | 7 | 96 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Southern Miss | W 44-7 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 34-37 | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Louisville | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 27-55 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Jacksonville State
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
West Virginia
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Jacksonville State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Jacksonville State | 804 | 74.5 | 27.1 | 804 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Jacksonville State | 804 | 74.5 | 27.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | West Virginia | 540 | 76.4 | 19.6 | -264 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
184
Primary metric
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
126
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Utah
62
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kennesaw State
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Jacksonville State
804 primary output · 74.5 efficiency · 27.1 usage
61.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Jacksonville State
61.1
804 primary · 74.5 efficiency · 27.1 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · West Virginia
58.6
540 primary · 76.4 efficiency · 19.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,344
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.