Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2023-2025Army
Tobi Olawole
WR • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Buford, GA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
Tobi Olawole reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
46.7
Consistency
88.5
Season Value
45.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Army
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tobi Olawole, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Army. Tobi Olawole reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Army paired 101 primary output with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Army
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
7
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
27
Consistency
88.5
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Charlotte: 6. Tulane: 9. Tulsa: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Tulane: 1 by 60. Tulsa: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Losses7.5 · n=2
First Half7.5 · n=2
All Games7 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
60 vs Tulane
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 101 | 64 | 18.7 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -101 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Army | 21 | 46.7 | 27 | 21 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Charlotte
6
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
6
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Army
101 primary output · 64 efficiency · 18.7 usage
53.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Army
45.8
21 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
122
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 9 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.