Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2023-2025Alabama
Malik Benson
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Lansing, KS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Malik Benson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.2
Consistency
67.6
Season Value
67.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oregon
23242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Alabama • Florida State • Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Benson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oregon. Malik Benson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Oregon paired 719 primary output with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Florida State, Oregon.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: James Madison
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Oregon
Games
15
Receiving Yards / G
47.9
Efficiency
88.2
Usage
14.9
Consistency
67.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 23. Texas Tech: 51. James Madison: 119. Unknown: 51. Oklahoma State: 48. Northwestern: 62. Oregon State: 40. Penn State: 11. Indiana: 44. Rutgers: 21. Wisconsin: 0. Iowa: 29. Minnesota: 51. USC: 67. Washington: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 76.7. Texas Tech: 5 by 68. James Madison: 5 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 68. Oklahoma State: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 4 by 100. Oregon State: 3 by 88.9. Penn State: 2 by 36.7. Indiana: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Iowa: 2 by 96.7. Minnesota: 2 by 100. USC: 4 by 100. Washington: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins50.1 · n=12 · +16.6 vs Losses
Losses33.5 · n=2 · -16.6 vs Wins
First Half50.6 · n=8 · +5.8 vs Second Half
Second Half44.9 · n=7 · -5.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
James Madison
Best efficiency game
100 vs James Madison
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 23-0 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-34 | — | 5 | 119 | 23.8 | 23.80 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Washington100 receiving yards | W 26-14 | — | 5 | 102 | 20.4 | 20.40 | 1 | 64 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USC | W 42-27 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | — | — | — | -4 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Rutgers | W 56-10 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana | L 20-30 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State | W 30-24 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State | W 41-7 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | — | 4 | 62 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Florida State
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Oregon
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 162 | 64.4 | 9.1 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Florida State | 311 | 61.7 | 14.7 | 149 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 719 | 88.2 | 14.9 | 408 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 719 | 88.2 | 14.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
James Madison
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Oregon
719 primary output · 88.2 efficiency · 14.9 usage
67.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Oregon
67.7
719 primary · 88.2 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Florida State
44.2
311 primary · 61.7 efficiency · 14.7 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,192
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.