Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2015SMU
WR • 6'3" • Lubbock, TX, USA
Arrius Holleman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
1%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
9
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
9
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Arrius Holleman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · SMU. Arrius Holleman reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 45.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 57 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Arrius Holleman played WR for SMU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Arrius Holleman recorded 26 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
SMU paired 20 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
10
Efficiency
60
Usage
2.4
Consistency
60
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 17. Texas A&M: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | SMU | 6 | 40 | 3.8 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -6 |
| 2013 Regular Season | SMU | 20 | 60 | 2.4 | 20 |
| 2014 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | -20 |
| 2015 Regular Season | SMU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Texas Tech
Week 1 · L 23-41
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17
Receiving Yards
69.3 takeover
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Northwestern State
Week 3 · W 40-7
6
Receiving Yards
50.9 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
6 receiving yards with a 40 efficiency score.
#3
@ Texas A&M
Week 4 · L 13-42
3
Receiving Yards
15.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
3 receiving yards with a 20 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · SMU
20 primary output · 60 efficiency · 2.4 usage
57
#2
2011 Regular Season · SMU
45.7
6 primary · 40 efficiency · 3.8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · SMU
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.