Usage Score
4.4
Player Dossier
2024-2025Nebraska
WR • 6'5" • 210 lbs • Bozeman, MT, USA
Quinn Clark reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.4
Efficiency
88
Consistency
69.4
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Nebraska
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quinn Clark, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Nebraska. Quinn Clark reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Nebraska paired 132 primary output with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
26.4
Efficiency
88
Usage
4.4
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 31. Cincinnati: 7. Akron: 37. Michigan: 14. Minnesota: 43
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 46.7. Akron: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 93.3. Minnesota: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Nebraska | 132 | 88 | 4.4 | 132 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Nebraska | 132 | 88 | 4.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43
Primary metric
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
7
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Nebraska
132 primary output · 88 efficiency · 4.4 usage
65.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Nebraska
65.5
132 primary · 88 efficiency · 4.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Nebraska
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8564
Gallatin · Bozeman, MT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
132
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Quinn Clark quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit