Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2024-2025Duke
Chase Tyler
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Powder Springs, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chase Tyler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.7
Consistency
53.8
Season Value
59.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Duke
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Tyler, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Duke. Chase Tyler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Duke paired 120 primary output with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Duke
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
30
Efficiency
81.7
Usage
4.3
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
Syracuse
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 62. Tulane: 39. NC State: 7. Syracuse: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 100. NC State: 1 by 46.7. Syracuse: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins9.5 · n=2 · -41 vs Losses
Losses50.5 · n=2 · +41 vs Wins
First Half50.5 · n=2 · +41 vs Second Half
Second Half9.5 · n=2 · -41 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulane
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Duke | 1 | 6.7 | 7.1 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Duke | 120 | 81.7 | 4.3 | 119 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
62
Primary metric
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
1
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
1 receiving yards with a 6.7 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
NC State
7
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Duke
120 primary output · 81.7 efficiency · 4.3 usage
59.7
#2
2024 Regular Season · Duke
28.7
1 primary · 6.7 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8917
Hiram · Hiram, GA
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
121
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.