Usage Score
9.4
Player Dossier
2011-2015Utah State
WR • 6'4" • Oklahoma City, OK, USA
Brandon Swindall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.4
Efficiency
73.9
Consistency
58.3
Season Value
51.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Swindall, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Utah State. Brandon Swindall reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Utah State paired 285 primary output with 54.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
21.6
Efficiency
73.9
Usage
9.4
Consistency
58.3
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 35. Colorado State: 5. Fresno State: 14. Boise State: 26. Wyoming: 50. New Mexico: 6. Air Force: 26. BYU: 11
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 3 by 77.8. Colorado State: 1 by 33.3. Fresno State: 1 by 93.3. Boise State: 2 by 86.7. Wyoming: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 40. Air Force: 2 by 86.7. BYU: 1 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wyoming
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/22 | vs Akron2+ TD | L 21-23 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs BYU | L 28-51 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Air Force | L 28-35 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ New Mexico | L 13-14 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Wyoming | W 58-27 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Boise State | W 52-26 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Fresno State | W 56-14 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Colorado State | W 33-18 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah State | 19 | 36.7 | 6.5 | 19 |
| 2013 Postseason | Utah State | 285 | 54.7 | 12 | 266 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah State | 285 | 54.7 | 12 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah State | 37 | 49.3 | 27.8 | -248 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah State | 173 | 73.9 | 9.4 | 136 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah State | 173 | 73.9 | 9.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
50
Primary metric
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
San José State
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Air Force
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 84 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 49.3 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
16
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Utah State
285 primary output · 54.7 efficiency · 12 usage
54.4
#2
2013 Regular Season · Utah State
54.4
285 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Utah State
51.8
173 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 9.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.86
Azle · Azle, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
514
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandon Swindall quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit