Usage Score
9.5
Player Profile
Joel Stave
QB • 6'5" • Greenfield, WI, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Joel Stave is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
56.4
Consistency
79.3
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
111212131314141515
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Primary stop by seasons
- Wisconsin
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Joel Stave, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Wisconsin. Joel Stave is a balanced quarterback profile with 9.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Wisconsin paired 2,564 primary output with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 56.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 69.2th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
197.2
Efficiency
56.4
Usage
9.5
Consistency
79.3
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 215. Alabama: 204. Miami (OH): 232. Troy: 206. Hawai'i: 156. Iowa: 220. Nebraska: 329. Purdue: 326. Illinois: 45. Rutgers: 217. Maryland: 164. Northwestern: 171. Minnesota: 79
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 29 by 58.4. Alabama: 42 by 51.3. Miami (OH): 31 by 53.9. Troy: 18 by 78.9. Hawai'i: 24 by 55.1. Iowa: 42 by 46.4. Nebraska: 53 by 56.3. Purdue: 42 by 62.2. Illinois: 8 by 50.3. Rutgers: 25 by 64.1. Maryland: 29 by 52.8. Northwestern: 43 by 47.9. Minnesota: 17 by 56
Split Comparison
Wins196.9 · n=10 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses198.3 · n=3 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half223.1 · n=7 · +56.1 vs Second Half
Second Half167 · n=6 · -56.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
78.9 vs Troy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/31 | vs USC | W 23-21 | 18 | 27 | 217 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 58.4 | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Minnesota | W 31-21 | 9 | 17 | 79 | 52.9 | 0 | 1 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Northwestern | L 7-13 | 20 | 34 | 229 | 58.8 | 0 | 2 | 47.9 | 9 | -58 | -6.40 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Maryland | W 31-24 | 15 | 24 | 188 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 52.8 | 5 | -24 | -4.80 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Rutgers | W 48-10 | 13 | 25 | 217 | 52.0 | 1 | 2 | 64.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Illinois | W 24-13 | 3 | 7 | 49 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 50.3 | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Purdue300-yard game | W 24-7 | 30 | 39 | 322 | 76.9 | 0 | 1 | 62.2 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Nebraska300-yard game | W 23-21 | 24 | 50 | 322 | 48.0 | 1 | 0 | 56.3 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Iowa | L 6-10 | 21 | 38 | 234 | 55.3 | 0 | 2 | 46.4 | 4 | -14 | -3.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Hawai'i | W 28-0 | 14 | 23 | 164 | 60.9 | 1 | 0 | 55.1 | 1 | -8 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Troy | W 28-3 | 13 | 17 | 202 | 76.5 | 1 | 0 | 78.9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Miami (OH)3+ TD | W 58-0 | 19 | 30 | 236 | 63.3 | 3 | 1 | 53.9 | 1 | -4 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Alabama | L 17-35 | 26 | 39 | 228 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 51.3 | 3 | -24 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,053 | 58.5 | 7.7 | 1,053 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,053 | 58.5 | 7.7 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 2,472 | 54.4 | 7.1 | 1,419 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 2,472 | 54.4 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Wisconsin | 1,280 | 53.8 | 3.4 | -1,192 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1,280 | 53.8 | 3.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Wisconsin | 2,564 | 56.4 | 9.5 | 1,284 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 2,564 | 56.4 | 9.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
217
Primary metric
217 total offense with 64.1 efficiency.
#2
Purdue
326
Primary metric
Win with 326 yards of offense and 62.2 efficiency.
326 total offense with 62.2 efficiency.
#3
Illinois
257
Primary metric
Win with 257 yards of offense and 65.7 efficiency.
257 total offense with 65.7 efficiency.
#4
Nebraska
329
Primary metric
Win with 329 yards of offense and 56.3 efficiency.
329 total offense with 56.3 efficiency.
#5
Iowa
151
Primary metric
Win with 151 yards of offense and 90.3 efficiency.
151 total offense with 90.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Wisconsin
2,564 primary output · 56.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
61.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Wisconsin
61.3
2,564 primary · 56.4 efficiency · 9.5 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Wisconsin
60.4
2,472 primary · 54.4 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
5
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
7,369
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.