Usage Score
17.9
Player Profile
Bryce Underwood
QB • 6'4" • 228 lbs • Detroit, MI, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Bryce Underwood is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
61.2
Consistency
77.7
Season Value
64.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan
2525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Primary stop by seasons
- Michigan
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Bryce Underwood, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Michigan. Bryce Underwood is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Michigan paired 2,820 primary output with 61.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 61.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
216.9
Efficiency
61.2
Usage
17.9
Consistency
77.7
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 268. New Mexico: 246. Oklahoma: 141. Central Michigan: 349. Nebraska: 166. Wisconsin: 282. USC: 203. Washington: 255. Michigan State: 112. Purdue: 189. Northwestern: 310. Maryland: 235. Ohio State: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 56 by 53.7. New Mexico: 33 by 58.8. Oklahoma: 27 by 46.7. Central Michigan: 34 by 81.6. Nebraska: 30 by 67.6. Wisconsin: 33 by 68.1. USC: 29 by 54.4. Washington: 34 by 71.1. Michigan State: 22 by 60.3. Purdue: 29 by 64.7. Northwestern: 41 by 61.7. Maryland: 31 by 68.1. Ohio State: 24 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins238.2 · n=9 · +69.2 vs Losses
Losses169 · n=4 · -69.2 vs Wins
First Half236.4 · n=7 · +42.3 vs Second Half
Second Half194.2 · n=6 · -42.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
81.6 vs Central Michigan
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Texas3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 27-41 | 23 | 42 | 199 | 54.8 | 2 | 3 | 53.7 | 14 | 69 | 4.90 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Ohio State | L 9-27 | 8 | 18 | 63 | 44.4 | 0 | 1 | 38.3 | 6 | 1 | 0.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Maryland | W 45-20 | 16 | 23 | 215 | 69.6 | 2 | 0 | 68.1 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Northwestern | W 24-22 | 21 | 32 | 280 | 65.6 | 0 | 2 | 61.7 | 9 | 30 | 3.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Purdue | W 21-16 | 13 | 22 | 145 | 59.1 | 0 | 1 | 64.7 | 7 | 44 | 6.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Michigan State | W 31-20 | 8 | 17 | 86 | 47.1 | 0 | 0 | 60.3 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Washington | W 24-7 | 21 | 27 | 230 | 77.8 | 2 | 0 | 71.1 | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ USC | L 13-31 | 15 | 24 | 207 | 62.5 | 2 | 1 | 54.4 | 5 | -4 | -0.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Wisconsin | W 24-10 | 19 | 28 | 270 | 67.9 | 1 | 0 | 68.1 | 5 | 12 | 2.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ NebraskaDual-threat | W 30-27 | 12 | 22 | 105 | 54.5 | 0 | 0 | 67.6 | 8 | 61 | 7.60 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Central Michigan3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 63-3 | 16 | 25 | 235 | 64.0 | 1 | 1 | 81.6 | 9 | 114 | 12.70 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-24 | 9 | 24 | 142 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | 46.7 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs New Mexico | W 34-17 | 21 | 31 | 251 | 67.7 | 1 | 0 | 58.8 | 2 | -5 | -2.50 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Michigan | 2,820 | 61.2 | 17.9 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Michigan | 2,820 | 61.2 | 17.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
349
Primary metric
349 total offense with 81.6 efficiency.
#2
Northwestern
310
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
310 total offense with 61.7 efficiency.
#3
Texas
268
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
268 total offense with 53.7 efficiency.
#4
Wisconsin
282
Primary metric
Win with 282 yards of offense and 68.1 efficiency.
282 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#5
Washington
255
Primary metric
Win with 255 yards of offense and 71.1 efficiency.
255 total offense with 71.1 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Michigan
2,820 primary output · 61.2 efficiency · 17.9 usage
64.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Michigan
64.2
2,820 primary · 61.2 efficiency · 17.9 usage
Milestones
5
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9998
Belleville · Belleville, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
2,820
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.