Usage Score
27.8
Player Profile
Bear Bachmeier
QB • 6'2" • 220 lbs • Murrieta, CA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Bear Bachmeier is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
64.3
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU
2525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Primary stop by seasons
- BYU
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Bear Bachmeier, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · BYU. Bear Bachmeier is a balanced quarterback profile with 27.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
BYU paired 3,560 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with 356 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency. It landed in the 92.9th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · BYU
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
254.3
Efficiency
64.3
Usage
27.8
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 325. Unknown: 129. Stanford: 182. East Carolina: 272. Colorado: 277. West Virginia: 394. Arizona: 261. Utah: 230. Iowa State: 356. Texas Tech: 200. TCU: 355. Cincinnati: 173. UCF: 293. Texas Tech: 113
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 39 by 57.9. Unknown: 16 by 75.3. Stanford: 39 by 55.7. East Carolina: 30 by 76.5. Colorado: 42 by 72.7. West Virginia: 37 by 73. Arizona: 51 by 50.9. Utah: 33 by 70. Iowa State: 47 by 69.2. Texas Tech: 49 by 50.5. TCU: 43 by 75.9. Cincinnati: 38 by 59.4. UCF: 34 by 71.2. Texas Tech: 36 by 41.3
Split Comparison
Wins283.5 · n=11 · +127.0 vs Losses
Losses156.5 · n=2 · -127.0 vs Wins
First Half262.9 · n=7 · +17.1 vs Second Half
Second Half245.7 · n=7 · -17.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
76.5 vs East Carolina
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Georgia Tech300-yard game | W 25-21 | 27 | 38 | 325 | 71.1 | 1 | 1 | 57.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-34 | 16 | 27 | 115 | 59.3 | 0 | 2 | 41.3 | 9 | -2 | -0.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs UCF | W 41-21 | 21 | 25 | 289 | 84.0 | 1 | 0 | 71.2 | 9 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Cincinnati | W 26-14 | 15 | 25 | 127 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 59.4 | 13 | 46 | 3.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs TCUDual-threat | W 44-13 | 23 | 33 | 296 | 69.7 | 1 | 0 | 75.9 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-29 | 23 | 38 | 188 | 60.5 | 1 | 1 | 50.5 | 11 | 12 | 1.10 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-27 | 22 | 35 | 307 | 62.9 | 2 | 0 | 69.2 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs UtahDual-threat | W 24-21 | 13 | 22 | 166 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 70 | 11 | 64 | 5.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Arizona3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 33-27 | 12 | 29 | 172 | 41.4 | 1 | 2 | 50.9 | 22 | 89 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs West Virginia300-yard game | W 38-24 | 18 | 25 | 351 | 72.0 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 12 | 43 | 3.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/28 | @ ColoradoDual-threat | W 24-21 | 19 | 27 | 179 | 70.4 | 2 | 0 | 72.7 | 15 | 98 | 6.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ East Carolina | W 34-13 | 18 | 25 | 246 | 72.0 | 1 | 0 | 76.5 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Stanford | W 27-3 | 17 | 27 | 175 | 63.0 | 0 | 0 | 55.7 | 12 | 7 | 0.60 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 8/31 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 7 | 11 | 97 | 63.6 | 3 | 0 | 75.3 | 5 | 32 | 6.40 | 2 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | BYU | 3,560 | 64.3 | 27.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | BYU | 3,560 | 64.3 | 27.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with 356 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency.
356
Primary metric
356 total offense with 69.2 efficiency.
#2
West Virginia
394
Primary metric
Win with 394 yards of offense and 73 efficiency.
394 total offense with 73 efficiency.
#3
TCU
355
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
355 total offense with 75.9 efficiency.
#4
Colorado
277
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
277 total offense with 72.7 efficiency.
#5
UCF
293
Primary metric
Win with 293 yards of offense and 71.2 efficiency.
293 total offense with 71.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · BYU
3,560 primary output · 64.3 efficiency · 27.8 usage
67.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · BYU
67.3
3,560 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 27.8 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8933
Murrieta Valley · Murrieta, CA
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
3,560
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.