Usage Score
11.4
Player Profile
Jake Coker
QB • 6'5" • Mobile, AL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Jake Coker is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
63.7
Consistency
80.8
Season Value
64
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Alabama
1213141515
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Florida State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Alabama
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Jake Coker, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Alabama. Jake Coker is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Alabama paired 3,178 primary output with 63.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 63.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida State, Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Win with 315 yards of offense and 66 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Alabama
Games
15
Primary Metric / G
211.9
Efficiency
63.7
Usage
11.4
Consistency
80.8
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 315. Michigan State: 280. Wisconsin: 200. Middle Tennessee: 219. Ole Miss: 259. UL Monroe: 153. Georgia: 218. Arkansas: 279. Texas A&M: 151. Tennessee: 221. LSU: 158. Mississippi State: 150. Unknown: 156. Auburn: 192. Florida: 227
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 33 by 66. Michigan State: 35 by 65.7. Wisconsin: 24 by 64. Middle Tennessee: 27 by 65.2. Ole Miss: 52 by 62.2. UL Monroe: 35 by 46.1. Georgia: 22 by 78.6. Arkansas: 40 by 59.7. Texas A&M: 32 by 60.1. Tennessee: 34 by 59.8. LSU: 30 by 59.7. Mississippi State: 26 by 63. Unknown: 14 by 73.5. Auburn: 29 by 66.5. Florida: 34 by 65.8
Split Comparison
Wins212.5 · n=13
First Half240.4 · n=8 · +61.1 vs Second Half
Second Half179.3 · n=7 · -61.1 vs First Half
All Games211.9 · n=15
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
78.6 vs Georgia
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/12 | @ Clemson300-yard game | W 45-40 | 16 | 25 | 335 | 64.0 | 2 | 0 | 66 | 8 | -20 | -2.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 1/1 | vs Michigan State | W 38-0 | 25 | 30 | 286 | 83.3 | 2 | 0 | 65.7 | 5 | -6 | -1.20 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Florida | W 29-15 | 18 | 26 | 204 | 69.2 | 2 | 0 | 65.8 | 8 | 23 | 2.90 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Auburn | W 29-13 | 17 | 26 | 179 | 65.4 | 1 | 0 | 66.5 | 3 | 13 | 4.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Unknown | — | 11 | 13 | 155 | 84.6 | 2 | 0 | 73.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Mississippi State | W 31-6 | 15 | 25 | 144 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 63 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs LSU | W 30-16 | 18 | 24 | 184 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 59.7 | 6 | -26 | -4.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Tennessee | W 19-14 | 21 | 27 | 247 | 77.8 | 0 | 1 | 59.8 | 7 | -26 | -3.70 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Texas A&M | W 41-23 | 19 | 25 | 138 | 76.0 | 0 | 0 | 60.1 | 7 | 13 | 1.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Arkansas | W 27-14 | 24 | 33 | 262 | 72.7 | 2 | 2 | 59.7 | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Georgia | W 38-10 | 11 | 16 | 190 | 68.8 | 1 | 0 | 78.6 | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UL Monroe3+ TD | W 34-0 | 17 | 31 | 158 | 54.8 | 3 | 1 | 46.1 | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Ole Miss3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 37-43 | 21 | 45 | 201 | 46.7 | 3 | 2 | 62.2 | 7 | 58 | 8.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 37-10 | 15 | 26 | 214 | 57.7 | 1 | 1 | 65.2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Wisconsin | W 35-17 | 15 | 21 | 213 | 71.4 | 1 | 0 | 64 | 3 | -13 | -4.30 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida State
2012-2013
Opening stop
- 2
Alabama
2014-2015
Final stop
Season Progression
20122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Florida State | 45 | 81 | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Florida State | 265 | 65.4 | 5.7 | 220 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Alabama | 416 | 61.6 | 6.3 | 151 |
| 2015 Postseason | Alabama | 3,178 | 63.7 | 11.4 | 2,762 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Alabama | 3,178 | 63.7 | 11.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 19 yards of offense and 76.4 efficiency.
19
Primary metric
19 total offense with 76.4 efficiency.
#2
Unknown
16
Primary metric
Game with 16 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
16 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#3
Wake Forest
10
Primary metric
Win with 10 yards of offense and 94.4 efficiency.
10 total offense with 94.4 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
115
Primary metric
Game with 115 yards of offense and 73.3 efficiency.
115 total offense with 73.3 efficiency.
#5
Pittsburgh
21
Primary metric
Win with 21 yards of offense and 95.8 efficiency.
21 total offense with 95.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Alabama
3,178 primary output · 63.7 efficiency · 11.4 usage
64
#2
2015 Regular Season · Alabama
64
3,178 primary · 63.7 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Florida State
54.4
45 primary · 81 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
20
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,904
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.