Usage Score
11.3
Player Dossier
2011-2015Temple
John Christopher
WR • 5'11" • Ormond Beach, FL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
John Christopher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
63.4
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
48.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Temple
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
John Christopher, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Temple. John Christopher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Temple paired 331 primary output with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Temple
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
23.1
Efficiency
63.4
Usage
11.3
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 3. Penn State: 13. Massachusetts: 72. UCF: 28. East Carolina: 9. Notre Dame: 22. SMU: 28. South Florida: 27. Memphis: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 20. Penn State: 1 by 86.7. Massachusetts: 7 by 68.6. UCF: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 1 by 60. Notre Dame: 2 by 73.3. SMU: 3 by 62.2. South Florida: 3 by 60. Memphis: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins26 · n=6 · +8.7 vs Losses
Losses17.3 · n=3 · -8.7 vs Wins
First Half25 · n=5 · +4.3 vs Second Half
Second Half20.8 · n=4 · -4.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | @ Toledo | L 17-32 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Memphis | W 31-12 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ South Florida | L 23-44 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ SMU | W 60-40 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Notre Dame | L 20-24 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 10/22 | @ East Carolina | W 24-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs UCF | W 30-16 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Massachusetts | W 25-23 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Penn State | W 27-10 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 122 | 73.5 | 11.1 | 122 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 331 | 67.5 | 14.7 | 209 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Temple | 194 | 59.8 | 15.8 | -137 |
| 2015 Postseason | Temple | 208 | 63.4 | 11.3 | 14 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Temple | 208 | 63.4 | 11.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44
Primary metric
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Massachusetts
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 68.6 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 62.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Temple
331 primary output · 67.5 efficiency · 14.7 usage
63.4
#2
2014 Regular Season · Temple
53
194 primary · 59.8 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Temple
48.8
208 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 11.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
855
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.