Usage Score
28.4
Player Dossier
2013-2015Temple
Robby Anderson
WR • 6'3" • Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Robby Anderson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.2
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
68.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Temple
13141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robby Anderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Temple. Robby Anderson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Temple paired 939 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Temple
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
67.1
Efficiency
79.2
Usage
28.4
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 66. Penn State: 20. Cincinnati: 23. Massachusetts: 69. Charlotte: 35. Tulane: 73. UCF: 42. East Carolina: 126. Notre Dame: 53. SMU: 83. South Florida: 77. Memphis: 80. UConn: 42. Houston: 150
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 6 by 73.3. Penn State: 5 by 26.7. Cincinnati: 5 by 30.7. Massachusetts: 2 by 100. Charlotte: 3 by 77.8. Tulane: 4 by 100. UCF: 4 by 70. East Carolina: 8 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. SMU: 4 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. UConn: 6 by 46.7. Houston: 12 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Wins59.3 · n=10 · -27.2 vs Losses
Losses86.5 · n=4 · +27.2 vs Wins
First Half46.9 · n=7 · -40.4 vs Second Half
Second Half87.3 · n=7 · +40.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/23 | @ Toledo | L 17-32 | — | 6 | 66 | 10.1 | 11 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-24 | — | 12 | 150 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs UConn | W 27-3 | — | 6 | 42 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Memphis | W 31-12 | — | 5 | 80 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ South Florida | L 23-44 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ SMU | W 60-40 | — | 4 | 83 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 46 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Notre Dame | L 20-24 | — | 2 | 53 | 17.7 | 26.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Thu 10/22 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 8 | 126 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs UCF | W 30-16 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Tulane | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 23 |
| Fri 10/2 | @ Charlotte2+ TD | W 37-3 | — | 3 | 35 | 10 | 11.70 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Massachusetts | W 25-23 | — | 2 | 69 | 34.5 | 34.50 | 0 | 53 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Cincinnati | W 34-26 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.7 | 4.60 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Penn State | W 27-10 | — | 5 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2013-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
2013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 791 | 85.7 | 24.6 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | -791 |
| 2015 Postseason | Temple | 939 | 79.2 | 28.4 | 939 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Temple | 939 | 79.2 | 28.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
239
Primary metric
239 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
150
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
184
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Temple
939 primary output · 79.2 efficiency · 28.4 usage
68.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Temple
68.9
939 primary · 79.2 efficiency · 28.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Temple
61.4
791 primary · 85.7 efficiency · 24.6 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8061
South Plantation · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- Temple
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,730
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.