Usage Score
12.8
Player Dossier
2011-2014Toledo
Justin Olack
WR • 6'4" • Massillon, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Justin Olack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.8
Consistency
52
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo
111212131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Olack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Toledo. Justin Olack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
Toledo paired 308 primary output with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Toledo
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
34.2
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
12.8
Consistency
52
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 21. Unknown: 24. Cincinnati: 64. Ball State: 71. Central Michigan: 20. Kent State: 44. Northern Illinois: 33. Bowling Green: 9. Eastern Michigan: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 5 by 85.3. Ball State: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 73.3. Bowling Green: 1 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins31.2 · n=6 · -17.3 vs Losses
Losses48.5 · n=2 · +17.3 vs Wins
First Half40 · n=5 · +13 vs Second Half
Second Half27 · n=4 · -13 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/5 | @ Arkansas State | W 63-44 | — | 1 | 21 | 11 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 52-16 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 22 |
| Thu 11/20 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Northern Illinois | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/5 | @ Kent State | W 30-20 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Central Michigan | W 42-28 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Ball State | W 34-23 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Fri 9/12 | @ Cincinnati | L 34-58 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 10 | 66.7 | 5.6 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Toledo | 260 | 75.4 | 9.8 | 250 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Toledo | 260 | 75.4 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Toledo | 205 | 57.9 | 13.9 | -55 |
| 2014 Postseason | Toledo | 308 | 85.8 | 12.8 | 103 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Toledo | 308 | 85.8 | 12.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · Toledo
308 primary output · 85.8 efficiency · 12.8 usage
62.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · Toledo
62.7
308 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Toledo
59.6
260 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8628
Swainsboro · Swainsboro, GA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
783
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.