Usage Score
27.2
Player Dossier
2011-2013Indiana
Cody Latimer
WR • 6'3" • Dayton, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Cody Latimer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
87.3
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
68.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana
111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Indiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Latimer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Indiana. Cody Latimer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Indiana paired 1,096 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Indiana
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
91.3
Efficiency
87.3
Usage
27.2
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 44. Navy: 29. Bowling Green: 137. Missouri: 136. Penn State: 140. Michigan State: 58. Michigan: 96. Minnesota: 55. Illinois: 189. Wisconsin: 42. Ohio State: 60. Purdue: 110
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 100. Navy: 3 by 64.4. Bowling Green: 6 by 100. Missouri: 8 by 100. Penn State: 9 by 100. Michigan State: 7 by 55.2. Michigan: 5 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 91.7. Illinois: 11 by 100. Wisconsin: 5 by 56. Ohio State: 5 by 80. Purdue: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins144 · n=4 · +76 vs Losses
Losses68 · n=7 · -76 vs Wins
First Half90.7 · n=6 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half92 · n=6 · +1.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Purdue100 receiving yards | W 56-36 | — | 7 | 110 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Ohio State | L 14-42 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 3-51 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-35 | — | 11 | 189 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 3 | 50 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Minnesota | L 39-42 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Michigan | L 47-63 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Michigan State | L 28-42 | — | 7 | 58 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Penn State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-24 | — | 9 | 140 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 33 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs Missouri100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-45 | — | 8 | 136 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Bowling Green100 receiving yards | W 42-10 | — | 6 | 137 | 22.8 | 22.80 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Navy | L 35-41 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Indiana
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Indiana | 141 | 61.4 | 9.7 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Indiana | 805 | 88 | 15.8 | 664 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Indiana | 1,096 | 87.3 | 27.2 | 291 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
189
Primary metric
189 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Indiana
1,096 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 27.2 usage
68.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Indiana
63
805 primary · 88 efficiency · 15.8 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Indiana
30.6
141 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 9.7 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8641
East Surry · Pilot Mountain, NC
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
2,042
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.