Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025UAB
Kam Shanks
WR • 5'8" • 170 lbs • Prattville, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kam Shanks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70
Consistency
10
Season Value
26.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UAB
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UAB • Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kam Shanks, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · UAB. Kam Shanks reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
UAB paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UAB, Arkansas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
10.1
Efficiency
70
Usage
10.2
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 19. Arkansas State: 0. Ole Miss: 6. Memphis: 0. Tennessee: 44. Texas A&M: 0. Mississippi State: 32. LSU: 0. Texas: 0. Missouri: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 42.2. Ole Miss: 1 by 40. Tennessee: 3 by 97.8. Mississippi State: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses10.3 · n=8
First Half13.8 · n=5 · +7.4 vs Second Half
Second Half6.4 · n=5 · -7.4 vs First Half
All Games10.1 · n=10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Missouri | L 17-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Texas | L 37-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ LSU | L 22-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Mississippi State | L 35-38 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Texas A&M | L 42-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Tennessee | L 31-34 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Memphis | L 31-32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Ole Miss | L 35-41 | — | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Arkansas State | W 56-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Arkansas
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 656 | 59.5 | 22.5 | 656 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Arkansas | 101 | 70 | 10.2 | -555 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
153
Primary metric
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tennessee
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
Army
119
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 88.1 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
73
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 81.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · UAB
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Regular Season · UAB
56.5
656 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Arkansas
26.1
101 primary · 70 efficiency · 10.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
757
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.