Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Tulane
Chris Brazzell II
WR • 6'5" • 200 lbs • Midland, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Chris Brazzell II reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.5
Consistency
66
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tennessee
2223242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulane • Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Brazzell II, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Tennessee. Chris Brazzell II reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 1,017 primary output with 84.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 89.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulane, Tennessee.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
59.3
Efficiency
89.5
Usage
23.2
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 53. Southern Miss: 35. Unknown: 42. UAB: 49. Memphis: 103. North Texas: 50. Rice: 75. East Carolina: 26. Tulsa: 41. Florida Atlantic: 103. UTSA: 93. SMU: 41
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 4 by 88.3. Southern Miss: 3 by 77.8. Unknown: 4 by 70. UAB: 2 by 100. Memphis: 3 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 100. Rice: 5 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 57.8. Tulsa: 3 by 91.1. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 98.1. UTSA: 5 by 100. SMU: 3 by 91.1
Split Comparison
Wins62.8 · n=10
First Half55.3 · n=6 · -7.8 vs Second Half
Second Half63.2 · n=6 · +7.8 vs First Half
All Games59.3 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/2 | vs SMU | L 14-26 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/24 | vs UTSA2+ TD | W 29-16 | — | 5 | 93 | 18.6 | 18.60 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards | W 24-8 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Tulsa | W 24-22 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ East Carolina | W 13-10 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Rice | W 30-28 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs North Texas | W 35-28 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 28 |
| Fri 10/13 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards | W 31-21 | — | 3 | 103 | 34.3 | 34.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs UAB | W 35-23 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Southern Miss | W 21-3 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs South Alabama | W 37-17 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Tennessee
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Tulane | 11 | 73.3 | 4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tulane | 711 | 89.5 | 23.2 | 700 |
| 2024 Postseason | Tennessee | 333 | 61.5 | 13.5 | -378 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tennessee | 333 | 61.5 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1,017 | 84.8 | 22.1 | 684 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
177
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kent State
63
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Tennessee
1,017 primary output · 84.8 efficiency · 22.1 usage
66.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Tulane
62
711 primary · 89.5 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Tulane
44.6
11 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 4 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8493
Midland Legacy · Midland, TX
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,072
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.