Usage Score
2.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025UTEP
DB • 6'2" • 190 lbs • Phoenix, AZ, USA
Amier Boyd shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
2.9
Efficiency
15.3
Consistency
58
Season Value
30.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amier Boyd, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP. Amier Boyd shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15.3 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 15.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
15.3
Usage
2.9
Consistency
58
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Unknown: 1. Kent State: 0. Utah: 0. Houston: 0. Kansas: 1. Arizona State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 1. BYU: 1. UCF: 0. West Virginia: 1. BYU: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 7 by 49.2. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Arizona State: 4 by 26.7. Oklahoma State: 1 by 4.2. Kansas State: 2 by 18.3. BYU: 1 by 14.2. UCF: 1 by 4.2. West Virginia: 1 by 14.2. BYU: 1 by 14.2
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs Oregon | L 0-23 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYU | W 34-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas State | W 43-20 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State | L 22-26 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas | W 42-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State | W 62-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2022-2024
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 16.7 | 3 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 12.3 | 2.2 | 4 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 18.1 | 3.4 | 2 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 9 | 15.3 | 2.9 | 3 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 9 | 15.3 | 2.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#2
Kennesaw State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.1 takeover score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.8 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 27 takeover score.
#5
Arizona State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 3 usage
39.9
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
30.3
9 primary · 15.3 efficiency · 2.9 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
30.3
9 primary · 15.3 efficiency · 2.9 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7944
Mountain Pointe · Phoenix, AZ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
61
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Amier Boyd quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit