Usage Score
28.1
Player Dossier
2023-2025James Madison
Elijah Sarratt
WR • 6'2" • 209 lbs • Stafford, VA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Elijah Sarratt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.1
Consistency
73.6
Season Value
72.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · James Madison
232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- James Madison • Indiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Elijah Sarratt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · James Madison. Elijah Sarratt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
James Madison paired 1,191 primary output with 89.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 89.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across James Madison, Indiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · James Madison
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
91.6
Efficiency
89.1
Usage
28.1
Consistency
73.6
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 115. Unknown: 29. Virginia: 52. Troy: 62. Utah State: 45. South Alabama: 92. Georgia Southern: 105. Marshall: 70. Old Dominion: 139. Georgia State: 87. UConn: 160. App State: 128. Coastal Carolina: 107
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 8 by 95.8. Unknown: 2 by 96.7. Virginia: 2 by 100. Troy: 6 by 68.9. Utah State: 4 by 75. South Alabama: 5 by 100. Georgia Southern: 5 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 66.7. Old Dominion: 8 by 100. Georgia State: 8 by 72.5. UConn: 13 by 82.1. App State: 8 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins91.9 · n=10 · -29.6 vs Losses
Losses121.5 · n=2 · +29.6 vs Wins
First Half71.4 · n=7 · -43.7 vs Second Half
Second Half115.2 · n=6 · +43.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Coastal Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-31 | — | 8 | 115 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Coastal Carolina100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-14 | — | 6 | 107 | 15.4 | 17.80 | 3 | 32 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs App State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-26 | — | 8 | 128 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-6 | — | 13 | 160 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Georgia StateHigh volume | W 42-14 | — | 8 | 87 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 39 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Old Dominion100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-27 | — | 8 | 139 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 1 | 40 |
| Thu 10/19 | @ Marshall | W 20-9 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Georgia Southern100 receiving yards | W 41-13 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs South Alabama | W 31-23 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 48 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Utah State | W 45-38 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Troy | W 16-14 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Virginia | W 36-35 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
James Madison
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Indiana
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | James Madison | 1,191 | 89.1 | 28.1 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | James Madison | 1,191 | 89.1 | 28.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Indiana | 957 | 92.1 | 21.4 | -234 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Indiana | 957 | 92.1 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 806 | 75.6 | 28.2 | -151 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 806 | 75.6 | 28.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
44
Primary metric
44 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#2
Iowa
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
165
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 82.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · James Madison
1,191 primary output · 89.1 efficiency · 28.1 usage
72.7
#2
2023 Regular Season · James Madison
72.7
1,191 primary · 89.1 efficiency · 28.1 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Indiana
64.4
957 primary · 92.1 efficiency · 21.4 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,954
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.